The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Mnemic neglect: selective amnesia of one’s faults

Mnemic neglect: selective amnesia of one’s faults
Mnemic neglect: selective amnesia of one’s faults
The mnemic neglect model predicts and accounts for selective memory for social feedback as a function of various feedback properties. At the heart of the model is the mnemic neglect effect (MNE), defined as inferior recall for self-threatening feedback compared to other kinds of feedback. The effect emerges both in mundane realism settings and in minimal feedback settings. The effect is presumed to occur in the service of self-protection motivation. Mnemic neglect is pronounced when the feedback poses high levels of self-threat (i.e., can detect accurately one’s weakness), but is lost when self-threat is averted via a self-affirmation manipulation. Mnemic neglect is caused by self-threatening feedback being processed shallowly and in ways that separate it from stored (positive) self-knowledge. For example, mnemic neglect is lost when feedback processing occurs under cognitive load. The emergence of mnemic neglect is qualified by situational moderators (extent to which one considers their self-conceptions modifiable, receives feedback from a close source, or is primed with improvement-related constructs) and individual differences moderators (anxiety, dysphoria, or defensive pessimism). Finally, the MNE is present in recall, but absent in recognition. Output interference cannot explain this disparity in results, but an inhibitory repression account (e.g., experiential avoidance) can: Repressors show enhanced mnemic neglect. The findings advance research on memory, motivation, and the self.
1046-3283
1-62
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Green, Jeffery D.
6b127b29-67bd-47e1-88c5-a869f83416f8
Saunders, Jo
4fa0a395-c784-4c1a-9621-f6d599ca89e0
Skowronski, John J.
47eb23aa-177b-4634-b986-5b935998bf6b
Zengel, Bettina
9d343ec9-7b10-45e3-b818-41287d9c4bd5
Sedikides, Constantine
9d45e66d-75bb-44de-87d7-21fd553812c2
Green, Jeffery D.
6b127b29-67bd-47e1-88c5-a869f83416f8
Saunders, Jo
4fa0a395-c784-4c1a-9621-f6d599ca89e0
Skowronski, John J.
47eb23aa-177b-4634-b986-5b935998bf6b
Zengel, Bettina
9d343ec9-7b10-45e3-b818-41287d9c4bd5

Sedikides, Constantine, Green, Jeffery D., Saunders, Jo, Skowronski, John J. and Zengel, Bettina (2016) Mnemic neglect: selective amnesia of one’s faults. European Review of Social Psychology, 27 (1), 1-62. (doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1183913).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The mnemic neglect model predicts and accounts for selective memory for social feedback as a function of various feedback properties. At the heart of the model is the mnemic neglect effect (MNE), defined as inferior recall for self-threatening feedback compared to other kinds of feedback. The effect emerges both in mundane realism settings and in minimal feedback settings. The effect is presumed to occur in the service of self-protection motivation. Mnemic neglect is pronounced when the feedback poses high levels of self-threat (i.e., can detect accurately one’s weakness), but is lost when self-threat is averted via a self-affirmation manipulation. Mnemic neglect is caused by self-threatening feedback being processed shallowly and in ways that separate it from stored (positive) self-knowledge. For example, mnemic neglect is lost when feedback processing occurs under cognitive load. The emergence of mnemic neglect is qualified by situational moderators (extent to which one considers their self-conceptions modifiable, receives feedback from a close source, or is primed with improvement-related constructs) and individual differences moderators (anxiety, dysphoria, or defensive pessimism). Finally, the MNE is present in recall, but absent in recognition. Output interference cannot explain this disparity in results, but an inhibitory repression account (e.g., experiential avoidance) can: Repressors show enhanced mnemic neglect. The findings advance research on memory, motivation, and the self.

Text
2016 Sedikides et al. ERSP - Accepted Manuscript
Download (282kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 26 April 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 24 May 2016
Published date: 2016
Organisations: Human Wellbeing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 392660
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/392660
ISSN: 1046-3283
PURE UUID: 87146642-fd29-4d6c-afa8-ac56f4aa5a9c
ORCID for Constantine Sedikides: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4036-889X
ORCID for Bettina Zengel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0871-3158

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2016 09:25
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:29

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jeffery D. Green
Author: Jo Saunders
Author: John J. Skowronski
Author: Bettina Zengel ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×