Distress in significant others of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review of the literature
Distress in significant others of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review of the literature
Purpose: To systematically review existing empirical research assessing levels and correlates of distress in significant others of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).
Methods: Systematic searches in CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO were conducted in August 2014. The search was repeated in January 2015 to check for newly published articles. Studies published in English with quantitative, qualitative or mixed designs exploring distress, poor subjective health, poor mental health, reduced quality of life and wellbeing, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in significant others (>18 years) of children and adults with CFS/ME were included. Quality appraisal of included studies was carried out. Quantitative and qualitative studies were summarized separately.
Results: Six articles met eligibility criteria. Two quantitative studies with significant others of adult patients, and one quantitative and two mixed-method studies with significant others of child patients showed moderate to high levels of distress. One qualitative study (adult patients) found minimal evidence of distress and that acceptance of CFS/ME was related to better adjustment. In the quantitative and mixed-method studies, significant others who attributed some level of responsibility for symptoms to the patient, or who were female, or whose partners had poorer mental health, had higher levels of distress.
Conclusions: The small number of studies to date, the contrary evidence from a qualitative study, and the limited data available on levels of distress in significant others of patients with CFS/ME means that our conclusion that distress levels are elevated is provisional. We recommend that future qualitative studies focus on this particular topic. Further longitudinal studies exploring correlates of distress within the context of a predictive theoretical model would be helpful.
881-893
Harris, Kamelia
92eeb10a-8cf6-439a-bbd1-559cac19637a
Band, Rebecca
be8901bb-bb1b-4131-8e19-c1d4a3bdfb8d
Cooper, Hazel
eeee9451-fc29-4304-8ef3-4397000effc2
Macintyre, Vanessa
8b99699a-d0c2-402b-8618-77a03159eea1
Meija, Anilena
2819e01d-8bb2-45b1-95d0-debfb361a91c
Wearden, Alison
57425d54-35b4-450e-8deb-ab18cd7016dc
November 2016
Harris, Kamelia
92eeb10a-8cf6-439a-bbd1-559cac19637a
Band, Rebecca
be8901bb-bb1b-4131-8e19-c1d4a3bdfb8d
Cooper, Hazel
eeee9451-fc29-4304-8ef3-4397000effc2
Macintyre, Vanessa
8b99699a-d0c2-402b-8618-77a03159eea1
Meija, Anilena
2819e01d-8bb2-45b1-95d0-debfb361a91c
Wearden, Alison
57425d54-35b4-450e-8deb-ab18cd7016dc
Harris, Kamelia, Band, Rebecca, Cooper, Hazel, Macintyre, Vanessa, Meija, Anilena and Wearden, Alison
(2016)
Distress in significant others of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.
British Journal of Health Psychology, 21 (4), .
(doi:10.1111/bjhp.12202).
Abstract
Purpose: To systematically review existing empirical research assessing levels and correlates of distress in significant others of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME).
Methods: Systematic searches in CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO were conducted in August 2014. The search was repeated in January 2015 to check for newly published articles. Studies published in English with quantitative, qualitative or mixed designs exploring distress, poor subjective health, poor mental health, reduced quality of life and wellbeing, and symptoms of depression and anxiety in significant others (>18 years) of children and adults with CFS/ME were included. Quality appraisal of included studies was carried out. Quantitative and qualitative studies were summarized separately.
Results: Six articles met eligibility criteria. Two quantitative studies with significant others of adult patients, and one quantitative and two mixed-method studies with significant others of child patients showed moderate to high levels of distress. One qualitative study (adult patients) found minimal evidence of distress and that acceptance of CFS/ME was related to better adjustment. In the quantitative and mixed-method studies, significant others who attributed some level of responsibility for symptoms to the patient, or who were female, or whose partners had poorer mental health, had higher levels of distress.
Conclusions: The small number of studies to date, the contrary evidence from a qualitative study, and the limited data available on levels of distress in significant others of patients with CFS/ME means that our conclusion that distress levels are elevated is provisional. We recommend that future qualitative studies focus on this particular topic. Further longitudinal studies exploring correlates of distress within the context of a predictive theoretical model would be helpful.
Text
BJHP FINAL Carer distress review_09 05 16.docx
- Accepted Manuscript
More information
Accepted/In Press date: 9 May 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 6 October 2016
Published date: November 2016
Organisations:
Psychology
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 393990
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/393990
ISSN: 1359-107X
PURE UUID: 42e7ca34-8242-458a-988f-484dee8e27fe
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 10 May 2016 10:59
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 05:33
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Kamelia Harris
Author:
Rebecca Band
Author:
Hazel Cooper
Author:
Vanessa Macintyre
Author:
Anilena Meija
Author:
Alison Wearden
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics