The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems.

Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems.
Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems.
Over the last decade several dozen direct dates on cave art pigments or associated materials have supplemented more traditional style-based attempts to establish a chronological (and developmental) scheme for cave art. In the “post-stylistic” era an holistic integration of pigment “recipe” analysis, formal stylistic analysis and direct chronometric dating have been applied to a handful of dates. Here, we examine the state-of-the-art of Palaeolithic cave art dating, with particular emphasis on certain radiocarbon and Uranium-series projects. We examine the relative successes and weaknesses of this cutting edge science. We conclude that there are several weaknesses in current applications that are in serious need of addressing. Issues of sample contamination and of the heuristic relationship between materials dated and the production of the art are particularly problematic. It follows that one should at present be very cautious about straightforward interpretations of apparent “dates” of cave art.
1072-5369
27-47
Pettitt, Paul
c16321c1-e3aa-4413-9963-80fac13ea4e9
Pike, Alistair
e8603e20-0a89-4d57-a294-247b983fc857
Pettitt, Paul
c16321c1-e3aa-4413-9963-80fac13ea4e9
Pike, Alistair
e8603e20-0a89-4d57-a294-247b983fc857

Pettitt, Paul and Pike, Alistair (2007) Dating European Palaeolithic rock art: progress, prospects, problems. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14 (1), 27-47. (doi:10.1007/s10816-007-9026-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Over the last decade several dozen direct dates on cave art pigments or associated materials have supplemented more traditional style-based attempts to establish a chronological (and developmental) scheme for cave art. In the “post-stylistic” era an holistic integration of pigment “recipe” analysis, formal stylistic analysis and direct chronometric dating have been applied to a handful of dates. Here, we examine the state-of-the-art of Palaeolithic cave art dating, with particular emphasis on certain radiocarbon and Uranium-series projects. We examine the relative successes and weaknesses of this cutting edge science. We conclude that there are several weaknesses in current applications that are in serious need of addressing. Issues of sample contamination and of the heuristic relationship between materials dated and the production of the art are particularly problematic. It follows that one should at present be very cautious about straightforward interpretations of apparent “dates” of cave art.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: March 2007
Organisations: Archaeology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 394412
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/394412
ISSN: 1072-5369
PURE UUID: ed35a8c9-a8a8-4baf-90bd-57990a9c6bfc
ORCID for Alistair Pike: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5610-8948

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 27 Jun 2016 15:54
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul Pettitt
Author: Alistair Pike ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×