The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Randomized trial of erlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy for NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases

Randomized trial of erlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy for NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases
Randomized trial of erlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy for NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases
Background: Median survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases is poor. We examined concurrent erlotinib and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by maintenance erlotinib in patients with untreated brain metastases, given the potential radiosensitizing properties of erlotinib and its direct effect on brain metastases and systemic activity.

Methods: Eighty NSCLC patients with KPS of 70 and greater and multiple brain metastases were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 40) or erlotinib (100mg, n = 40) given concurrently with WBRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions). Following WBRT, patients continued with placebo or erlotinib (150mg) until disease progression. The primary end point was neurological progression-free survival (nPFS); hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression. All P values were two-sided.

Results: Fifteen patients (37.5%) from each arm were alive and without neurological progression 2 months after WBRT. Median nPFS was 1.6 months in both arms; nPFS HR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.59 to1.54; P = .84). Median overall survival (OS) was 2.9 and 3.4 months in the placebo and erlotinib arms; HR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.58 to 1.55; P = .83). The frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations was low with only 1 of 35 (2.9%) patients with available samples had activating EGFR-mutations. Grade 3/4 adverse event rates were similar between the two groups (70.0% in each arm), except for rash 20.0% (erlotinib) vs 5.0% (placebo), and fatigue 17.5% vs 35.0%. No statistically significant quality of life differences were found.

Conclusions: Our study showed no advantage in nPFS or OS for concurrent erlotinib and WBRT followed by maintenance erlotinib in patients with predominantly EGFR wild-type NSCLC and multiple brain metastases compared to placebo. Future studies should focus on the role of erlotinib with or without WBRT in patients with EGFR mutations.

Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BM), which are associated with poor outcome (median survival <5 months) (1–3). Treatment options include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without corticosteroids. Modifying the radiation dose or fractionation or combining radiotherapy with radiosensitizers have not substantially improved prognosis (4–10). More than half of patients treated with WBRT ultimately die of progressive systemic disease (11–13).

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway inhibitor, is currently approved as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, and, as maintenance, second-line or third-line treatments following chemotherapy (14–17). Pre-clinical data show that erlotinib enhances the inhibitory effect of ionizing radiation in lung cancer, and it crosses the blood-brain barrier, so it could be used to provide sufficient radiosensitizing and therapeutic level in the brain (18–22).

To exploit the potential radiosensitizing properties, the direct effect on brain metastases, and systemic activity of erlotinib, we examined the role of erlotinib given concurrently with WBRT, then as maintenance.
0027-8874
1-7
Lee, Siow Ming
ac35e8c5-f0d4-4b12-9847-c54a2032d125
Lewanski, Conrad R.
81511a8b-bedc-412e-aecd-0f576069337e
Counsell, Nicholas
bc2d8598-2106-4202-97e2-33ed7f18daa5
Ottensmeier, Christian
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Bates, Andrew
9717be99-0b39-45f9-bf72-1e44ba2996ac
Patel, Nirali
101001ec-fc29-4c98-8d4c-10da3f845cba
Wadsworth, Christina
3abdc241-a115-404f-987d-a1f4954b5c93
Ngai, Yenting
d5b4e9dc-5f94-4072-91a0-8545db506d13
Hackshaw, Allan
fabfe335-1aa6-4634-9d4a-0a1f3fac5b32
Faivre-Finn, Corinne
5964eb34-717a-4ce7-80f8-4033e467a8a8
Lee, Siow Ming
ac35e8c5-f0d4-4b12-9847-c54a2032d125
Lewanski, Conrad R.
81511a8b-bedc-412e-aecd-0f576069337e
Counsell, Nicholas
bc2d8598-2106-4202-97e2-33ed7f18daa5
Ottensmeier, Christian
42b8a398-baac-4843-a3d6-056225675797
Bates, Andrew
9717be99-0b39-45f9-bf72-1e44ba2996ac
Patel, Nirali
101001ec-fc29-4c98-8d4c-10da3f845cba
Wadsworth, Christina
3abdc241-a115-404f-987d-a1f4954b5c93
Ngai, Yenting
d5b4e9dc-5f94-4072-91a0-8545db506d13
Hackshaw, Allan
fabfe335-1aa6-4634-9d4a-0a1f3fac5b32
Faivre-Finn, Corinne
5964eb34-717a-4ce7-80f8-4033e467a8a8

Lee, Siow Ming, Lewanski, Conrad R., Counsell, Nicholas, Ottensmeier, Christian, Bates, Andrew, Patel, Nirali, Wadsworth, Christina, Ngai, Yenting, Hackshaw, Allan and Faivre-Finn, Corinne (2014) Randomized trial of erlotinib plus whole-brain radiotherapy for NSCLC patients with multiple brain metastases. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 106 (7), 1-7. (doi:10.1093/jnci/dju151). (PMID:25031274)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Median survival of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases is poor. We examined concurrent erlotinib and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) followed by maintenance erlotinib in patients with untreated brain metastases, given the potential radiosensitizing properties of erlotinib and its direct effect on brain metastases and systemic activity.

Methods: Eighty NSCLC patients with KPS of 70 and greater and multiple brain metastases were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 40) or erlotinib (100mg, n = 40) given concurrently with WBRT (20 Gy in 5 fractions). Following WBRT, patients continued with placebo or erlotinib (150mg) until disease progression. The primary end point was neurological progression-free survival (nPFS); hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox regression. All P values were two-sided.

Results: Fifteen patients (37.5%) from each arm were alive and without neurological progression 2 months after WBRT. Median nPFS was 1.6 months in both arms; nPFS HR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.59 to1.54; P = .84). Median overall survival (OS) was 2.9 and 3.4 months in the placebo and erlotinib arms; HR 0.95 (95% CI = 0.58 to 1.55; P = .83). The frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations was low with only 1 of 35 (2.9%) patients with available samples had activating EGFR-mutations. Grade 3/4 adverse event rates were similar between the two groups (70.0% in each arm), except for rash 20.0% (erlotinib) vs 5.0% (placebo), and fatigue 17.5% vs 35.0%. No statistically significant quality of life differences were found.

Conclusions: Our study showed no advantage in nPFS or OS for concurrent erlotinib and WBRT followed by maintenance erlotinib in patients with predominantly EGFR wild-type NSCLC and multiple brain metastases compared to placebo. Future studies should focus on the role of erlotinib with or without WBRT in patients with EGFR mutations.

Up to 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases (BM), which are associated with poor outcome (median survival <5 months) (1–3). Treatment options include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without corticosteroids. Modifying the radiation dose or fractionation or combining radiotherapy with radiosensitizers have not substantially improved prognosis (4–10). More than half of patients treated with WBRT ultimately die of progressive systemic disease (11–13).

Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway inhibitor, is currently approved as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, and, as maintenance, second-line or third-line treatments following chemotherapy (14–17). Pre-clinical data show that erlotinib enhances the inhibitory effect of ionizing radiation in lung cancer, and it crosses the blood-brain barrier, so it could be used to provide sufficient radiosensitizing and therapeutic level in the brain (18–22).

To exploit the potential radiosensitizing properties, the direct effect on brain metastases, and systemic activity of erlotinib, we examined the role of erlotinib given concurrently with WBRT, then as maintenance.

Text
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst-2014-Lee-.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Other.
Download (552kB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 28 April 2014
Published date: July 2014
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 396347
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/396347
ISSN: 0027-8874
PURE UUID: a87ddd04-029b-4d99-b368-fed67d8062bc

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Jun 2016 13:53
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 00:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Siow Ming Lee
Author: Conrad R. Lewanski
Author: Nicholas Counsell
Author: Andrew Bates
Author: Nirali Patel
Author: Christina Wadsworth
Author: Yenting Ngai
Author: Allan Hackshaw
Author: Corinne Faivre-Finn

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×