The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Establishing subsidiary bodies at the 2005 NPT review conference

Establishing subsidiary bodies at the 2005 NPT review conference
Establishing subsidiary bodies at the 2005 NPT review conference
Decision 1, Para 6 of the 1995 states that “subsidiary bodies could be established within the respective Main Committees for specific issues relevant to the Treaty, so as to provide for a focussed consideration of such issues.” In 1999 the rules of procedure for the 2000 Conference were changed from those used in 1995 as a consequence of this decision.
In 1995 Rule 34 on “Main Committees and Working Groups” stated that “Each such [Main] Committee may establish working groups. As a general rule each State Party to the Treaty participating in the Conference may be represented in the working groups unless otherwise decided by consensus”. For 2000, this was altered, despite opposition from Russia which saw no need for any change as they regarded a subsidiary body as a working group, to “Main Committees and subsidiary bodies” and included the statement: “Each such [Main] Committee may establish subsidiary bodies so as to provide for a focused consideration of specific issues relevant to the Treaty. As a general rule each State Party to the Treaty participating in the Conference may be represented in the subsidiary bodies unless otherwise decided by consensus”.
1-5
Simpson, John
d2e46e13-6100-4f62-b93e-467425ff1a81
Simpson, John
d2e46e13-6100-4f62-b93e-467425ff1a81

Simpson, John (2005) Establishing subsidiary bodies at the 2005 NPT review conference. Mountbatten Centre for International Studies NPT Issue Review, 1-5.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Decision 1, Para 6 of the 1995 states that “subsidiary bodies could be established within the respective Main Committees for specific issues relevant to the Treaty, so as to provide for a focussed consideration of such issues.” In 1999 the rules of procedure for the 2000 Conference were changed from those used in 1995 as a consequence of this decision.
In 1995 Rule 34 on “Main Committees and Working Groups” stated that “Each such [Main] Committee may establish working groups. As a general rule each State Party to the Treaty participating in the Conference may be represented in the working groups unless otherwise decided by consensus”. For 2000, this was altered, despite opposition from Russia which saw no need for any change as they regarded a subsidiary body as a working group, to “Main Committees and subsidiary bodies” and included the statement: “Each such [Main] Committee may establish subsidiary bodies so as to provide for a focused consideration of specific issues relevant to the Treaty. As a general rule each State Party to the Treaty participating in the Conference may be represented in the subsidiary bodies unless otherwise decided by consensus”.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 39772
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/39772
PURE UUID: 0152f7a4-abfc-4376-a1f4-91eecdbb7146

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jun 2006
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 15:47

Export record

Contributors

Author: John Simpson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×