The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery of liver metastases: a single-centre experience

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery of liver metastases: a single-centre experience
Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery of liver metastases: a single-centre experience
In the era of multimodal management of liver metastases, surgical resection remains the only curative option, with open approach still being referred to as the standard of care. Currently, the feasibility and benefits of the laparoscopic approach for liver resection have been largely demonstrated. However, its oncologic adequacy remains to be confirmed. The aim of this study is to report the oncological results of laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic disease in a single-centre experience. A single-centre database of 413 laparoscopic liver resections was reviewed and procedures for liver metastases were selected. The assessment of oncologic outcomes included analysis of minimal tumour-free margin, R1 resection rate and 3-year survival. The feasibility and safety of the procedures were also evaluated through analysis of perioperative outcomes. The study comprised 209 patients (294 procedures). Colorectal liver metastases were the commonest indication (67.9%). Fourteen patients had conversion (6.7%) and oncological concern was the commonest reason for conversion (42.8%). Median tumour-free margin was 10 mm and complete radical resections were achieved in 211 of 218 curative-intent procedures (96.7%). For patients affected by colorectal liver metastases, 1- and 3-year OS resulted 85.9 and 66.7%. For patients affected by neuroendocrine liver metastases, 1- and 3-year OS resulted 93 and 77.8%. Among the patients with metastases from other primaries, 1- and 3-year OS were 83.3 and 70.5%. The laparoscopic approach is a safe and valid option in the treatment of patients with metastatic liver disease undergoing curative resection. It does offer significant perioperative benefits without compromise of oncologic outcomes.
2038-131X
185-191
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Rawashdeh, Majd
16176f99-a7b6-426b-8fe6-e1adb68d3726
Ahmed, Mohamed
dadd35d9-b0c3-423e-a322-7dabee95bd9d
Armstrong, Thomas
3b87df01-cd08-4048-91c4-7390c73a5960
Pearce, Neil W.
6e450393-03db-472b-9231-1aa2e39b0565
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47
Cipriani, Federica
aca25573-d300-425d-ba9c-20be3190ce2e
Rawashdeh, Majd
16176f99-a7b6-426b-8fe6-e1adb68d3726
Ahmed, Mohamed
dadd35d9-b0c3-423e-a322-7dabee95bd9d
Armstrong, Thomas
3b87df01-cd08-4048-91c4-7390c73a5960
Pearce, Neil W.
6e450393-03db-472b-9231-1aa2e39b0565
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
384e1c60-8519-4eed-8e92-91775aad4c47

Cipriani, Federica, Rawashdeh, Majd, Ahmed, Mohamed, Armstrong, Thomas, Pearce, Neil W. and Abu Hilal, Mohammad (2015) Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery of liver metastases: a single-centre experience. Updates in Surgery, 67 (2), 185-191. (doi:10.1007/s13304-015-0308-1). (PMID:26109140)

Record type: Article

Abstract

In the era of multimodal management of liver metastases, surgical resection remains the only curative option, with open approach still being referred to as the standard of care. Currently, the feasibility and benefits of the laparoscopic approach for liver resection have been largely demonstrated. However, its oncologic adequacy remains to be confirmed. The aim of this study is to report the oncological results of laparoscopic liver resection for metastatic disease in a single-centre experience. A single-centre database of 413 laparoscopic liver resections was reviewed and procedures for liver metastases were selected. The assessment of oncologic outcomes included analysis of minimal tumour-free margin, R1 resection rate and 3-year survival. The feasibility and safety of the procedures were also evaluated through analysis of perioperative outcomes. The study comprised 209 patients (294 procedures). Colorectal liver metastases were the commonest indication (67.9%). Fourteen patients had conversion (6.7%) and oncological concern was the commonest reason for conversion (42.8%). Median tumour-free margin was 10 mm and complete radical resections were achieved in 211 of 218 curative-intent procedures (96.7%). For patients affected by colorectal liver metastases, 1- and 3-year OS resulted 85.9 and 66.7%. For patients affected by neuroendocrine liver metastases, 1- and 3-year OS resulted 93 and 77.8%. Among the patients with metastases from other primaries, 1- and 3-year OS were 83.3 and 70.5%. The laparoscopic approach is a safe and valid option in the treatment of patients with metastatic liver disease undergoing curative resection. It does offer significant perioperative benefits without compromise of oncologic outcomes.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 25 June 2015
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 400315
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/400315
ISSN: 2038-131X
PURE UUID: 8f2e716f-4ff5-47de-8962-3bd27c6fadb9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Sep 2016 11:00
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 02:14

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Federica Cipriani
Author: Majd Rawashdeh
Author: Mohamed Ahmed
Author: Thomas Armstrong
Author: Neil W. Pearce
Author: Mohammad Abu Hilal

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×