The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review

Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review
Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review
Background: Identification of risk factors for lower extremity (LE) injury in sport and military/first-responder occupations is required to inform injury prevention strategies.

Objective: To determine if poor movement quality is associated with LE injury in sport and military/first-responder occupations.

Materials and methods: 5 electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies selected included original data; analytic design; movement quality outcome (qualitative rating of functional compensation, asymmetry, impairment or efficiency of movement control); LE injury sustained with sport or military/first-responder occupation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. 2 independent authors assessed the quality (Downs and Black (DB) criteria) and level of evidence (Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine model).

Results: Of 4361 potential studies, 17 were included. The majority were low-quality cohort studies (level 4 evidence). Median DB score was 11/33 (range 3–15). Heterogeneity in methodology and injury definition precluded meta-analyses. The Functional Movement Screen was the most common outcome investigated (15/17 studies). 4 studies considered inter-relationships between risk factors, 7 reported diagnostic accuracy and none tested an intervention programme targeting individuals identified as high risk. There is inconsistent evidence that poor movement quality is associated with increased risk of LE injury in sport and military/first-responder occupations.

Conclusions: Future research should focus on high-quality cohort studies to identify the most relevant movement quality outcomes for predicting injury risk followed by developing and evaluating preparticipation screening and LE injury prevention programmes through high-quality randomised controlled trials targeting individuals at greater risk of injury based on screening tests with validated test properties.
0306-3674
1-7
Whittaker, Jackie L.
fc854e87-cb7a-441a-bf5d-0d42990eaffb
Booysen, Nadine
fb84e148-0594-45ed-9eab-22ae99ab916e
de la Motte, Sarah
f438f651-445a-4305-9ac1-530fc0ec1123
Dennett, Liz
fe8958cc-3a8b-4594-9df7-ea1781c7c16f
Lewis, Cara L.
8fec9da1-d0e8-4f2b-afd7-37bb5aebfb57
Wilson, Dave
c3a39c4c-722b-4ff6-9531-a8d04e9a40c1
McKay, Carly
12af30d9-148f-4cb7-b14c-f356c30fe82a
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Padua, Darin
6a22a117-afd4-40e4-9b99-c07bde2d9d46
Emery, Carolyn A.
fdf242a3-e4af-499b-a182-4bd8a053b050
Stokes, Maria
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f
Whittaker, Jackie L.
fc854e87-cb7a-441a-bf5d-0d42990eaffb
Booysen, Nadine
fb84e148-0594-45ed-9eab-22ae99ab916e
de la Motte, Sarah
f438f651-445a-4305-9ac1-530fc0ec1123
Dennett, Liz
fe8958cc-3a8b-4594-9df7-ea1781c7c16f
Lewis, Cara L.
8fec9da1-d0e8-4f2b-afd7-37bb5aebfb57
Wilson, Dave
c3a39c4c-722b-4ff6-9531-a8d04e9a40c1
McKay, Carly
12af30d9-148f-4cb7-b14c-f356c30fe82a
Warner, Martin
f4dce73d-fb87-4f71-a3f0-078123aa040c
Padua, Darin
6a22a117-afd4-40e4-9b99-c07bde2d9d46
Emery, Carolyn A.
fdf242a3-e4af-499b-a182-4bd8a053b050
Stokes, Maria
71730503-70ce-4e67-b7ea-a3e54579717f

Whittaker, Jackie L., Booysen, Nadine, de la Motte, Sarah, Dennett, Liz, Lewis, Cara L., Wilson, Dave, McKay, Carly, Warner, Martin, Padua, Darin, Emery, Carolyn A. and Stokes, Maria (2017) Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51 (7), 1-7. (doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096760).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Identification of risk factors for lower extremity (LE) injury in sport and military/first-responder occupations is required to inform injury prevention strategies.

Objective: To determine if poor movement quality is associated with LE injury in sport and military/first-responder occupations.

Materials and methods: 5 electronic databases were systematically searched. Studies selected included original data; analytic design; movement quality outcome (qualitative rating of functional compensation, asymmetry, impairment or efficiency of movement control); LE injury sustained with sport or military/first-responder occupation. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. 2 independent authors assessed the quality (Downs and Black (DB) criteria) and level of evidence (Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine model).

Results: Of 4361 potential studies, 17 were included. The majority were low-quality cohort studies (level 4 evidence). Median DB score was 11/33 (range 3–15). Heterogeneity in methodology and injury definition precluded meta-analyses. The Functional Movement Screen was the most common outcome investigated (15/17 studies). 4 studies considered inter-relationships between risk factors, 7 reported diagnostic accuracy and none tested an intervention programme targeting individuals identified as high risk. There is inconsistent evidence that poor movement quality is associated with increased risk of LE injury in sport and military/first-responder occupations.

Conclusions: Future research should focus on high-quality cohort studies to identify the most relevant movement quality outcomes for predicting injury risk followed by developing and evaluating preparticipation screening and LE injury prevention programmes through high-quality randomised controlled trials targeting individuals at greater risk of injury based on screening tests with validated test properties.

Text
Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk.pdf - Accepted Manuscript
Download (673kB)
Text
Whittaker et al 2016_MovtScreenSR_BJSM.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 16 November 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 1 December 2016
Published date: April 2017
Organisations: Faculty of Health Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 403032
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/403032
ISSN: 0306-3674
PURE UUID: 88522645-1f0b-45ca-9939-343e0e3a9bba
ORCID for Nadine Booysen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8798-2411
ORCID for Dave Wilson: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-6304-2836
ORCID for Martin Warner: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-0561
ORCID for Maria Stokes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-4204-0890

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Nov 2016 15:08
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jackie L. Whittaker
Author: Nadine Booysen ORCID iD
Author: Sarah de la Motte
Author: Liz Dennett
Author: Cara L. Lewis
Author: Dave Wilson ORCID iD
Author: Carly McKay
Author: Martin Warner ORCID iD
Author: Darin Padua
Author: Carolyn A. Emery
Author: Maria Stokes ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×