The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effect of individually tailored biopsychosocial workplace interventions on chronic musculoskeletal pain and stress among laboratory technicians: Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of individually tailored biopsychosocial workplace interventions on chronic musculoskeletal pain and stress among laboratory technicians: Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of individually tailored biopsychosocial workplace interventions on chronic musculoskeletal pain and stress among laboratory technicians: Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal pain is prevalent among laboratory technicians and work-related stress may aggravate the problem.

OBJECTIVES This study investigated the effect of a multifaceted worksite intervention on pain and stress among laboratory technicians with chronic musculoskeletal pain using individually tailored physical and cognitive elements.

STUDY DESIGN This trial uses a single-blind randomized controlled design with allocation concealment in a 2-armed parallel group format among laboratory technicians. The trial "Implementation of physical exercise at the Workplace (IRMA09) - Laboratory technicians" was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov prior to participant enrolment.

SETTING The study was conducted at the head division of a large private pharmaceutical company's research and development department in Denmark. The study duration was March 2014 (baseline) to July 2014 (follow-up).

METHODS Participants (n = 112) were allocated to receive either physical, cognitive, and mindfulness group-based training (PCMT group) or a reference group (REF) for 10 weeks at the worksite. PCMT consisted of 4 major elements: 1) resistance training individually tailored to the pain affected area, 2) motor control training, 3) mindfulness, and 4) cognitive and behavioral therapy/education. Participants of the REF group were encouraged to follow ongoing company health initiatives. The predefined primary outcome measure was pain intensity (VAS scale 0-10) in average of the regions: neck, shoulder, lower and upper back, elbow, and hand at 10 week follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was stress assessed by Cohen´s perceived stress questionnaire. In addition, an explorative dose-response analysis was performed on the adherence to PCMT with pain and stress, respectively, as outcome measures.

RESULTS A significant (P {\textless} 0.0001) treatment by time interaction in pain intensity was observed with a between-group difference at follow-up of -1.0 (95{\%}CI: -1.4 to -0.6). No significant effect on stress was observed (treatment by time P = 0.16). Exploratory analyses for each body region separately showed significant pain reductions of the neck, shoulders, upper back and lower back, as well as a tendency for hand pain. Within the PCMT group, general linear models adjusted for age, baseline pain, and stress levels showed significant associations for the change in pain with the number of physical-cognitive training sessions per week (-0.60 [95{\%}CI -0.95 to -0.25]) and the number of mindfulness sessions (0.15 [95{\%}CI 0.02 to 0.18]). No such associations were found with the change in stress as outcome. LIMITATIONS Limitations of behavioral interventions include the inability to blind participants to which intervention they receive. Self-reported outcomes are a limitation as they may be influenced by placebo effects and outcome expectations.

CONCLUSIONS We observed significant reductions in chronic musculoskeletal pain following a 10-week individually adjusted multifaceted intervention with physical training emphasizing dynamic joint mobility and mindfulness coupled with fear-avoidance and de-catastrophizing behavioral therapy compared to a reference group encouraged to follow on-going company health initiatives. A higher dose of physical-cognitive training appears to facilitate pain reduction, whereas a higher dose of mindfulness appears to increase pain. Hence, combining physical training with mindfulness may not be an optimal strategy for pain reduction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02047669.
459-471
Jay, Kenneth
cb40dd68-57b6-478c-b51c-5021137bce51
Brandt, Mikkel
535e53c8-8423-4ebf-b523-c3c405dceaf2
Hansen, Klaus
e8574dd7-fe18-4399-8f7d-80221258ed68
Sundstrup, Emil
cdde3daa-655b-4993-b32d-3e4c09271b20
Jakobsen, Markus D
d7e60f18-8352-4fb9-b0e3-a3ecdfd37d80
schraefel, m.c.
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f
Sjøgaard, Gisela
b8c02c9f-4b4e-42e8-b30f-69e724fe6781
Andersen, Lars L
1f944131-d570-4319-990e-bda13357bbaa
Jay, Kenneth
cb40dd68-57b6-478c-b51c-5021137bce51
Brandt, Mikkel
535e53c8-8423-4ebf-b523-c3c405dceaf2
Hansen, Klaus
e8574dd7-fe18-4399-8f7d-80221258ed68
Sundstrup, Emil
cdde3daa-655b-4993-b32d-3e4c09271b20
Jakobsen, Markus D
d7e60f18-8352-4fb9-b0e3-a3ecdfd37d80
schraefel, m.c.
ac304659-1692-47f6-b892-15113b8c929f
Sjøgaard, Gisela
b8c02c9f-4b4e-42e8-b30f-69e724fe6781
Andersen, Lars L
1f944131-d570-4319-990e-bda13357bbaa

Jay, Kenneth, Brandt, Mikkel, Hansen, Klaus, Sundstrup, Emil, Jakobsen, Markus D, schraefel, m.c., Sjøgaard, Gisela and Andersen, Lars L (2015) Effect of individually tailored biopsychosocial workplace interventions on chronic musculoskeletal pain and stress among laboratory technicians: Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician, 18 (5), 459-471.

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal pain is prevalent among laboratory technicians and work-related stress may aggravate the problem.

OBJECTIVES This study investigated the effect of a multifaceted worksite intervention on pain and stress among laboratory technicians with chronic musculoskeletal pain using individually tailored physical and cognitive elements.

STUDY DESIGN This trial uses a single-blind randomized controlled design with allocation concealment in a 2-armed parallel group format among laboratory technicians. The trial "Implementation of physical exercise at the Workplace (IRMA09) - Laboratory technicians" was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov prior to participant enrolment.

SETTING The study was conducted at the head division of a large private pharmaceutical company's research and development department in Denmark. The study duration was March 2014 (baseline) to July 2014 (follow-up).

METHODS Participants (n = 112) were allocated to receive either physical, cognitive, and mindfulness group-based training (PCMT group) or a reference group (REF) for 10 weeks at the worksite. PCMT consisted of 4 major elements: 1) resistance training individually tailored to the pain affected area, 2) motor control training, 3) mindfulness, and 4) cognitive and behavioral therapy/education. Participants of the REF group were encouraged to follow ongoing company health initiatives. The predefined primary outcome measure was pain intensity (VAS scale 0-10) in average of the regions: neck, shoulder, lower and upper back, elbow, and hand at 10 week follow-up. The secondary outcome measure was stress assessed by Cohen´s perceived stress questionnaire. In addition, an explorative dose-response analysis was performed on the adherence to PCMT with pain and stress, respectively, as outcome measures.

RESULTS A significant (P {\textless} 0.0001) treatment by time interaction in pain intensity was observed with a between-group difference at follow-up of -1.0 (95{\%}CI: -1.4 to -0.6). No significant effect on stress was observed (treatment by time P = 0.16). Exploratory analyses for each body region separately showed significant pain reductions of the neck, shoulders, upper back and lower back, as well as a tendency for hand pain. Within the PCMT group, general linear models adjusted for age, baseline pain, and stress levels showed significant associations for the change in pain with the number of physical-cognitive training sessions per week (-0.60 [95{\%}CI -0.95 to -0.25]) and the number of mindfulness sessions (0.15 [95{\%}CI 0.02 to 0.18]). No such associations were found with the change in stress as outcome. LIMITATIONS Limitations of behavioral interventions include the inability to blind participants to which intervention they receive. Self-reported outcomes are a limitation as they may be influenced by placebo effects and outcome expectations.

CONCLUSIONS We observed significant reductions in chronic musculoskeletal pain following a 10-week individually adjusted multifaceted intervention with physical training emphasizing dynamic joint mobility and mindfulness coupled with fear-avoidance and de-catastrophizing behavioral therapy compared to a reference group encouraged to follow on-going company health initiatives. A higher dose of physical-cognitive training appears to facilitate pain reduction, whereas a higher dose of mindfulness appears to increase pain. Hence, combining physical training with mindfulness may not be an optimal strategy for pain reduction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02047669.

Text
2015;18;459-471 - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy

More information

Published date: September 2015
Organisations: Agents, Interactions & Complexity

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 405296
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405296
PURE UUID: 6345b2fc-31db-4494-9c67-d4288ef7e439
ORCID for m.c. schraefel: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9061-7957

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jan 2017 12:18
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:32

Export record

Contributors

Author: Kenneth Jay
Author: Mikkel Brandt
Author: Klaus Hansen
Author: Emil Sundstrup
Author: Markus D Jakobsen
Author: m.c. schraefel ORCID iD
Author: Gisela Sjøgaard
Author: Lars L Andersen

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×