The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals

Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals
Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals
OBJECTIVES: Clinical genetics guidelines from 2011 conceptualise genetic information as confidential to families, not individuals. The normative consequence of this is that the family's interest is the primary consideration and genetic information is shared unless there are good reasons not to do so. We investigated healthcare professionals' (HCPs') views about, and reasoning around, individual and familial approaches to confidentiality and how such views influenced their practice.

METHOD: 16 focus groups with 80 HCPs working in/with clinical genetics services were analysed, drawing on grounded theory.

RESULTS: Participants raised seven problems with, and arguments against, going beyond the individual approach to confidentiality. These problems fell into two overlapping categories: 'relationships' and 'structures'. Most participants had never considered ways to-or thought it was impossible to-treat familial genetic information and personal information differently. They worried that putting the familial approach into practice could disrupt family dynamics and erode patient trust in the health service. They also thought they had insufficient resources to share information and feared that sharing might change the standard of care and make them more vulnerable to liability.

CONCLUSIONS: A familial approach to confidentiality has not been accepted or adopted as a standard, but wider research suggests that some of the problems HCPs perceived are surmountable and sharing in the interest of the family can be achieved. However, further research is needed to explore how personal and familial genetic information can be separated in practice. Our findings are relevant to HCPs across health services who are starting to use genome tests as part of their routine investigations.
0959-8138
1-10
Dheensa, Sandi
d7d7e2bb-8def-4fad-9e1d-33d8141a0c9c
Fenwick, Angela
95a1f4fa-7f6f-4c07-a93b-9ea39c231c31
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Dheensa, Sandi
d7d7e2bb-8def-4fad-9e1d-33d8141a0c9c
Fenwick, Angela
95a1f4fa-7f6f-4c07-a93b-9ea39c231c31
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5

Dheensa, Sandi, Fenwick, Angela and Lucassen, Anneke (2017) Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine: a focus group study with healthcare professionals. British Medical Journal, 7 (2), 1-10. (doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012443). (PMID:28159847)

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Clinical genetics guidelines from 2011 conceptualise genetic information as confidential to families, not individuals. The normative consequence of this is that the family's interest is the primary consideration and genetic information is shared unless there are good reasons not to do so. We investigated healthcare professionals' (HCPs') views about, and reasoning around, individual and familial approaches to confidentiality and how such views influenced their practice.

METHOD: 16 focus groups with 80 HCPs working in/with clinical genetics services were analysed, drawing on grounded theory.

RESULTS: Participants raised seven problems with, and arguments against, going beyond the individual approach to confidentiality. These problems fell into two overlapping categories: 'relationships' and 'structures'. Most participants had never considered ways to-or thought it was impossible to-treat familial genetic information and personal information differently. They worried that putting the familial approach into practice could disrupt family dynamics and erode patient trust in the health service. They also thought they had insufficient resources to share information and feared that sharing might change the standard of care and make them more vulnerable to liability.

CONCLUSIONS: A familial approach to confidentiality has not been accepted or adopted as a standard, but wider research suggests that some of the problems HCPs perceived are surmountable and sharing in the interest of the family can be achieved. However, further research is needed to explore how personal and familial genetic information can be separated in practice. Our findings are relevant to HCPs across health services who are starting to use genome tests as part of their routine investigations.

Text
Approaching confidentiality at a familial level in genomic medicine.pdf - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 December 2016
e-pub ahead of print date: 3 February 2017
Published date: 3 February 2017
Organisations: Cancer Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 405598
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/405598
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 35f0130d-7d53-4a10-bf6f-151e7c4f1b38
ORCID for Anneke Lucassen: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-4338

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Feb 2017 14:02
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:23

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Sandi Dheensa
Author: Angela Fenwick
Author: Anneke Lucassen ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×