The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Going beyond routine data collection of clinical trials funded by the health technology assessment programme

Going beyond routine data collection of clinical trials funded by the health technology assessment programme
Going beyond routine data collection of clinical trials funded by the health technology assessment programme
Background: in 2015, a HTA funded project developed and piloted a database to capture ‘metadata’ on published HTA clinical trials in six priority areas: origins of the topic, the conduct and performance of trials, the statistical and economic analyses, and the cost of trials. The report recommendations were to expand, amend and update the database in terms of the number of trials and amount of data extracted.

Aims and objectives: to amend and update the database based on the published recommendations, explore trends over time and develop an NIHR portfolio database of active [pre-contracting to submission of final report] clinical trials.

Method: we reviewed the HTA portfolio for RCTs that had published in the HTA Journal Library since February 2011 to December 2014. The 65 questions which were recommended to be readily extracted, were reviewed and updated. RCTs published to December 2012 were used to pilot any alterations.

Results: the key findings will include all HTA funded clinical trials published to end December 2014. Based on previous work, data will be presented under the six priority areas such as the design of the trial, recruitment targets met/unmet and differences in results between new and old interventions.

Conclusions: expanding and updating the metadata database will provide important feedback about the quality of performance and reporting of HTA funded clinical trials. The continuation of the database will provide robust evidence of the lifecycle of funded trials from source of commissioning through to publications, including factors associated to what was originally planned.
1745-6215
Raftery, James
27c2661d-6c4f-448a-bf36-9a89ec72bd6b
Young, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Buxton, Helen
138698b4-d325-4c62-869c-7222497ed420
Raftery, James
27c2661d-6c4f-448a-bf36-9a89ec72bd6b
Young, Amanda
6bb7aa9c-776b-4bdd-be4e-cf67abd05652
Buxton, Helen
138698b4-d325-4c62-869c-7222497ed420

Raftery, James, Young, Amanda and Buxton, Helen (2015) Going beyond routine data collection of clinical trials funded by the health technology assessment programme. Trials, 16 (S2), [P42]. (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-S2-P42).

Record type: Meeting abstract

Abstract

Background: in 2015, a HTA funded project developed and piloted a database to capture ‘metadata’ on published HTA clinical trials in six priority areas: origins of the topic, the conduct and performance of trials, the statistical and economic analyses, and the cost of trials. The report recommendations were to expand, amend and update the database in terms of the number of trials and amount of data extracted.

Aims and objectives: to amend and update the database based on the published recommendations, explore trends over time and develop an NIHR portfolio database of active [pre-contracting to submission of final report] clinical trials.

Method: we reviewed the HTA portfolio for RCTs that had published in the HTA Journal Library since February 2011 to December 2014. The 65 questions which were recommended to be readily extracted, were reviewed and updated. RCTs published to December 2012 were used to pilot any alterations.

Results: the key findings will include all HTA funded clinical trials published to end December 2014. Based on previous work, data will be presented under the six priority areas such as the design of the trial, recruitment targets met/unmet and differences in results between new and old interventions.

Conclusions: expanding and updating the metadata database will provide important feedback about the quality of performance and reporting of HTA funded clinical trials. The continuation of the database will provide robust evidence of the lifecycle of funded trials from source of commissioning through to publications, including factors associated to what was originally planned.

Text
1745-6215-16-S2-P42 - Version of Record
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (294kB)

More information

Published date: 16 November 2015
Organisations: Primary Care & Population Sciences, NETSCC

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 408086
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/408086
ISSN: 1745-6215
PURE UUID: 01db2c50-c114-4013-829d-e877decd5ed7
ORCID for Amanda Young: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-5561

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 May 2017 01:08
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:31

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: James Raftery
Author: Amanda Young ORCID iD
Author: Helen Buxton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×