The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Kinetic study reveals weak Fe-binding ligand, which affects the solubility of Fe in the Scheldt estuary

Kinetic study reveals weak Fe-binding ligand, which affects the solubility of Fe in the Scheldt estuary
Kinetic study reveals weak Fe-binding ligand, which affects the solubility of Fe in the Scheldt estuary
The chemistry of dissolved Fe(III) was studied in the Scheldt estuary (The Netherlands). Two discrete size fractions of the dissolved bulk (<0.2 ?m and <1 kDa) were considered at three salinities (S=26, 10 and 0.3). Within the upper estuary, where fresh river water meets seawater, the dissolved Fe concentration decreases steeply with increasing salinity, for the fraction <0.2 ?m from 536 nM at S=0.3 to 104 nM at S=10 and for the fraction <1 kDa from 102 nM to 36 nM Fe. Further downstream, in the middle and lower estuary, this decrease in the Fe concentration continues, but is far less pronounced. For all samples, the traditionally recognised dissolved strong organic Fe-binding ligand concentrations are lower than the dissolved Fe concentrations. Characteristics of dissolved Fe-binding ligands were determined by observing kinetic interactions with adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry. From these kinetic experiments we concluded that apart from the well-known strong Fe binding organic ligands (L, logK’=19-22) also weak Fe-binding ligands (P) existed with an ? value (binding potential = K’x[P]) varying between 10^11.1 and 10^11.9. The presence of this relatively weak ligand explained the high concentrations of labile Fe present in both size fractions in the estuary. This weak ligand can retard or prevent a direct precipitation after an extra input of Fe. The dissociation rate constants of the weak ligand varied between 0.4x10^-4 and 78x10^-4 s^-1. The rate constants of the strong organic ligand varied between kd=1.5x10^-3 - 17x10^-2 s^-1 and kf=2.1x10^8 – 2.7x10^9 M^-1 s^-1. The dissociation rate constant of freshly amorphous Fe-hydroxide was found to be between 4x10^-4 and 4.3x10^-5 s^-1, more labile or equal to the values found by Rose and Waite (2003a) for freshly precipitated Fe in seawater. Kinetic rate constants of Fe with the ligand TAC (2-(2-Thiazolylazo)-p-cresol) were also determined. The formation rate constant of Fe(TAC)2 varied between 0.1x10^8 and 346x108 M^-1 s^-1, the dissociation rate constant between 0.1x10^-5 and 17x10^-5 s^-1 for both S=26 and S=10. The conditional stability constant of Fe(TAC)2 (?’Fe(TAC)2) varied between 22 and 23.4 for S=10 and S=26 more or less equal to that known from the literature (log?’Fe(TAC)2=22.4; Croot and Johansson, 2000). However, at S=0.3 the log?’Fe(TAC)2 was 25.3, three orders of magnitude higher. Apparently the application of TAC to samples of low salinity can only be done when the correct ?’Fe(TAC)2 is known.
iron, ligand, estuary, Fe species, kinetic rate constants
0304-4203
30-45
Gerringa, L.J.A.
740d8c6b-114c-4432-9f71-380fd9965179
Rijkenberg, M.J.A.
b801d0be-bd6a-4dbf-beb0-48a777fe5b64
Wolterbeek, H.T.
ad886a79-6d49-4d47-a7d3-32d561021a55
Verburg, T.G.
6927bfdd-0146-4322-8731-81dec6f8a78f
Boye, M.
6a3fb926-e1ed-40cc-87a0-63c9870f782b
de Baar, H.J.W.
c23aa060-a4a6-4fb6-a4ed-892b022d2410
Gerringa, L.J.A.
740d8c6b-114c-4432-9f71-380fd9965179
Rijkenberg, M.J.A.
b801d0be-bd6a-4dbf-beb0-48a777fe5b64
Wolterbeek, H.T.
ad886a79-6d49-4d47-a7d3-32d561021a55
Verburg, T.G.
6927bfdd-0146-4322-8731-81dec6f8a78f
Boye, M.
6a3fb926-e1ed-40cc-87a0-63c9870f782b
de Baar, H.J.W.
c23aa060-a4a6-4fb6-a4ed-892b022d2410

Gerringa, L.J.A., Rijkenberg, M.J.A., Wolterbeek, H.T., Verburg, T.G., Boye, M. and de Baar, H.J.W. (2007) Kinetic study reveals weak Fe-binding ligand, which affects the solubility of Fe in the Scheldt estuary. Marine Chemistry, 103 (1-2), 30-45. (doi:10.1016/j.marchem.2006.06.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The chemistry of dissolved Fe(III) was studied in the Scheldt estuary (The Netherlands). Two discrete size fractions of the dissolved bulk (<0.2 ?m and <1 kDa) were considered at three salinities (S=26, 10 and 0.3). Within the upper estuary, where fresh river water meets seawater, the dissolved Fe concentration decreases steeply with increasing salinity, for the fraction <0.2 ?m from 536 nM at S=0.3 to 104 nM at S=10 and for the fraction <1 kDa from 102 nM to 36 nM Fe. Further downstream, in the middle and lower estuary, this decrease in the Fe concentration continues, but is far less pronounced. For all samples, the traditionally recognised dissolved strong organic Fe-binding ligand concentrations are lower than the dissolved Fe concentrations. Characteristics of dissolved Fe-binding ligands were determined by observing kinetic interactions with adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry. From these kinetic experiments we concluded that apart from the well-known strong Fe binding organic ligands (L, logK’=19-22) also weak Fe-binding ligands (P) existed with an ? value (binding potential = K’x[P]) varying between 10^11.1 and 10^11.9. The presence of this relatively weak ligand explained the high concentrations of labile Fe present in both size fractions in the estuary. This weak ligand can retard or prevent a direct precipitation after an extra input of Fe. The dissociation rate constants of the weak ligand varied between 0.4x10^-4 and 78x10^-4 s^-1. The rate constants of the strong organic ligand varied between kd=1.5x10^-3 - 17x10^-2 s^-1 and kf=2.1x10^8 – 2.7x10^9 M^-1 s^-1. The dissociation rate constant of freshly amorphous Fe-hydroxide was found to be between 4x10^-4 and 4.3x10^-5 s^-1, more labile or equal to the values found by Rose and Waite (2003a) for freshly precipitated Fe in seawater. Kinetic rate constants of Fe with the ligand TAC (2-(2-Thiazolylazo)-p-cresol) were also determined. The formation rate constant of Fe(TAC)2 varied between 0.1x10^8 and 346x108 M^-1 s^-1, the dissociation rate constant between 0.1x10^-5 and 17x10^-5 s^-1 for both S=26 and S=10. The conditional stability constant of Fe(TAC)2 (?’Fe(TAC)2) varied between 22 and 23.4 for S=10 and S=26 more or less equal to that known from the literature (log?’Fe(TAC)2=22.4; Croot and Johansson, 2000). However, at S=0.3 the log?’Fe(TAC)2 was 25.3, three orders of magnitude higher. Apparently the application of TAC to samples of low salinity can only be done when the correct ?’Fe(TAC)2 is known.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007
Keywords: iron, ligand, estuary, Fe species, kinetic rate constants

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 42898
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/42898
ISSN: 0304-4203
PURE UUID: 5448d553-c323-4916-a371-b858bd3d0cf8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Dec 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 08:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: L.J.A. Gerringa
Author: M.J.A. Rijkenberg
Author: H.T. Wolterbeek
Author: T.G. Verburg
Author: M. Boye
Author: H.J.W. de Baar

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×