The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample

The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample
The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample
It is unclear how well performance on recently developed, specialized executive tests, reflects problems that patients and their relatives complain of in real life. The ecological validity of four specialised tests of executive function: the Hayling and Brixton Tests, and the Zoo Map and Key Search sub-tests from the Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) battery, was assessed against the Dysexecutive Questionnaire from the BADS in a sample of 59 severely brain injured individuals. Results indicated that only the Hayling C was significantly negatively correlated (r=-.26, P<.05) with the informant version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire. An index of insight was not correlated with any of the executive tests. It is concluded that these tests have limited ecological validity when used to assess patients following severe head trauma.
0887-6177
429-437
Wood, R.L.
ac75cd17-4e53-4eac-a09e-840e4148d5b8
Liossi, C.
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558
Wood, R.L.
ac75cd17-4e53-4eac-a09e-840e4148d5b8
Liossi, C.
fd401ad6-581a-4a31-a60b-f8671ffd3558

Wood, R.L. and Liossi, C. (2006) The ecological validity of executive tests in a severely brain injured sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21 (5), 429-437.

Record type: Article

Abstract

It is unclear how well performance on recently developed, specialized executive tests, reflects problems that patients and their relatives complain of in real life. The ecological validity of four specialised tests of executive function: the Hayling and Brixton Tests, and the Zoo Map and Key Search sub-tests from the Behavioural Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome (BADS) battery, was assessed against the Dysexecutive Questionnaire from the BADS in a sample of 59 severely brain injured individuals. Results indicated that only the Hayling C was significantly negatively correlated (r=-.26, P<.05) with the informant version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire. An index of insight was not correlated with any of the executive tests. It is concluded that these tests have limited ecological validity when used to assess patients following severe head trauma.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 45044
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/45044
ISSN: 0887-6177
PURE UUID: 07a8b0be-d295-4c9e-b128-65958734f923
ORCID for C. Liossi: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0627-6377

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Mar 2007
Last modified: 09 Jan 2022 03:20

Export record

Contributors

Author: R.L. Wood
Author: C. Liossi ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×