Peritoneal closure - to close or not to close

Cheong, Ying-Ching, Bajekal, Nitu and Li, Tin-Chiu (2001) Peritoneal closure - to close or not to close. Human Reproduction, 16, (8), 1548-1552. (doi:10.1093/humrep/16.8.1548).


Full text not available from this repository.

Original Publication URL:


Peritoneal closure is a controversial issue among obstetricians and gynaecologists. This article reappraises the issue of peritoneal closure. We conducted a thorough literature search using Medline, Pubmed and Embase as well as a hand-search for all references quoted in the relevant papers. The routine non-closure of the peritoneum reduces operation time by an average of 6 min. Most studies showed no difference in the other outcome measures including infection/febrile episodes, analgesic/anaesthetics requirement, bowel function restoration, post-operative stay and adhesion formation. There are insufficient data concerning adhesion formation. In conclusion, apart from a slightly shorter operation time associated with non-closure of the peritoneum, many studies showed no difference in short-term morbidity in the closure and the non-closure group. More studies are needed to examine the long-term morbidity associated with the closure or the non-closure of the peritoneum.

Item Type: Article
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): doi:10.1093/humrep/16.8.1548
ISSNs: 0268-1161 (print)
Related URLs:
Subjects: R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Divisions : University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Medicine > Developmental Origins of Health and Disease
ePrint ID: 47952
Accepted Date and Publication Date:
August 2001Published
Date Deposited: 14 Aug 2007
Last Modified: 10 Jan 2017 14:01

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item