State intervention and vulnerable children: implementation revisited
Murray, Cathy, Pahl, Jan and Wincup, Emma (eds.) (2006) State intervention and vulnerable children: implementation revisited. Journal of Social Policy, 35, (2), 211-227. (doi:10.1017/S0047279405009499).
Full text not available from this repository.
This article derives from a two year study of ‘Home Supervision’, conducted as part of a programme of research on the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. The focus is on children looked after by the local authority who are on a legal supervision order at home, primarily as a consequence of having been abused or neglected, having offended or having failed to attend school without reasonable excuse. Two assumptions, both arguably a legacy of Lipsky, are challenged: first, that non-implementation by street-level bureaucrats is in opposition to their managers; and, second, the passivity of clients in respect of policy making. It is argued that the street-level bureaucrats and managers in the Home Supervision study share assumptive worlds in respect of children on home supervision, and that clients, as agentic actors, reveal a capacity for shaping policy at the implementation stage. These issues are explored and their implications for implementation studies and child welfare are discussed.
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Social Sciences > Social Work Studies
|Date Deposited:||24 Aug 2007|
|Last Modified:||01 Jun 2011 11:58|
|Contributors:||Murray, Cathy (Author)
Pahl, Jan (Editor)
Wincup, Emma (Editor)
|Contact Email Address:||firstname.lastname@example.org|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)