The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Two abyssal sites in the Southern Ocean influenced by different organic matter inputs: Environmental characterization and preliminary observations on the benthic foraminifera

Two abyssal sites in the Southern Ocean influenced by different organic matter inputs: Environmental characterization and preliminary observations on the benthic foraminifera
Two abyssal sites in the Southern Ocean influenced by different organic matter inputs: Environmental characterization and preliminary observations on the benthic foraminifera
The abundance and diversity of the deep-sea benthos are intimately linked to inputs of organic matter from the euphotic zone. However, it is often difficult to isolate the influence of surface productivity on benthic ecosystems from other environmental factors. To this end, two abyssal sites (4200 m water depth) located under contrasting productivity regimes around the Crozet Plateau, in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean, were sampled during the austral summer of 2004/2005. One site (M5), east of the Crozet Isles, was located beneath an area where there was an enduring seasonal phytoplankton bloom. The second site (M6) was located in an oligotrophic high-nutrient low-chlorophyll (HNLC) region to the south of the islands. Organic fluxes to the seafloor at these sites are thought to reflect the overlying productivities, so that the benthic environment to the east of the islands was more eutrophic than at the southerly station. All other environmental variables were similar at the two sites, which are located just 460 km apart.
The concentrations of chlorophyll-a and total organic carbon in the surficial sediments were significantly greater at the relatively eutrophic site, east of the islands (M5), than at the southerly site (M6). Total nitrogen, however, was similar at both sites. Significantly higher phytopigment concentrations were observed in the surficial sediments at the eutrophic site; in particular, the concentration of chlorophyll-a was 3 times greater than at the southern site, although the freshness of the labile component, as measured by chlorophyll-a to pheophorbide ratio, was not different between sites. These results confirm that fluxes of organic matter to the seafloor were higher at the site located beneath the bloom region. This was reflected in the abundance and diversity of live (stained) and dead benthic foraminifera (>125 ?m), which were greater at the eutrophic site. The species composition of the dead foraminiferal assemblages were similar at both sites, however, and were dominated by Nuttallides umbonifera, Pullenia bulloides, and Melonis pompiloides. An exception was the “phytodetritus species” Epistominella exigua, which was more abundant at the eutrophic site, indicating a larger seasonal component to the export under the bloom region. Differences in the organic matter input regimes at the two sites appear to influence the abundance and diversity, but not the overall species composition, of the foraminiferal assemblages.
Deep sea, Abyssal, Organic fluxes, Photosynthetic pigments, Total organic carbon, Benthic foraminifera
0967-0645
2275-2290
Hughes, J.A.
285bf26c-3175-4373-8cfa-449f38b4db30
Smith, T.
8af789d2-e097-40af-9632-514501c3c2f1
Chaillan, F.
1a8fd872-18ec-48be-9ef5-bda58f7cc253
Bett, B.J.
61342990-13be-45ae-9f5c-9540114335d9
Billett, D.S.M.
aab439e2-c839-4cd2-815c-3d401e0468db
Boorman, B.
f884fa25-f60c-4b35-bea8-85697732e9f4
Fisher, E.H.
6db25198-bf2e-4dc8-807f-7729b124969e
Frenz, M.
ef65689d-a1b9-497a-8d20-c05d7a3a6b4d
Wolff, G.A.
3a42c086-8356-449b-9d40-9b16758733c2
Hughes, J.A.
285bf26c-3175-4373-8cfa-449f38b4db30
Smith, T.
8af789d2-e097-40af-9632-514501c3c2f1
Chaillan, F.
1a8fd872-18ec-48be-9ef5-bda58f7cc253
Bett, B.J.
61342990-13be-45ae-9f5c-9540114335d9
Billett, D.S.M.
aab439e2-c839-4cd2-815c-3d401e0468db
Boorman, B.
f884fa25-f60c-4b35-bea8-85697732e9f4
Fisher, E.H.
6db25198-bf2e-4dc8-807f-7729b124969e
Frenz, M.
ef65689d-a1b9-497a-8d20-c05d7a3a6b4d
Wolff, G.A.
3a42c086-8356-449b-9d40-9b16758733c2

Hughes, J.A., Smith, T., Chaillan, F., Bett, B.J., Billett, D.S.M., Boorman, B., Fisher, E.H., Frenz, M. and Wolff, G.A. (2007) Two abyssal sites in the Southern Ocean influenced by different organic matter inputs: Environmental characterization and preliminary observations on the benthic foraminifera. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 54 (18-20), 2275-2290. (doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.06.006).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The abundance and diversity of the deep-sea benthos are intimately linked to inputs of organic matter from the euphotic zone. However, it is often difficult to isolate the influence of surface productivity on benthic ecosystems from other environmental factors. To this end, two abyssal sites (4200 m water depth) located under contrasting productivity regimes around the Crozet Plateau, in the Indian Ocean sector of the Southern Ocean, were sampled during the austral summer of 2004/2005. One site (M5), east of the Crozet Isles, was located beneath an area where there was an enduring seasonal phytoplankton bloom. The second site (M6) was located in an oligotrophic high-nutrient low-chlorophyll (HNLC) region to the south of the islands. Organic fluxes to the seafloor at these sites are thought to reflect the overlying productivities, so that the benthic environment to the east of the islands was more eutrophic than at the southerly station. All other environmental variables were similar at the two sites, which are located just 460 km apart.
The concentrations of chlorophyll-a and total organic carbon in the surficial sediments were significantly greater at the relatively eutrophic site, east of the islands (M5), than at the southerly site (M6). Total nitrogen, however, was similar at both sites. Significantly higher phytopigment concentrations were observed in the surficial sediments at the eutrophic site; in particular, the concentration of chlorophyll-a was 3 times greater than at the southern site, although the freshness of the labile component, as measured by chlorophyll-a to pheophorbide ratio, was not different between sites. These results confirm that fluxes of organic matter to the seafloor were higher at the site located beneath the bloom region. This was reflected in the abundance and diversity of live (stained) and dead benthic foraminifera (>125 ?m), which were greater at the eutrophic site. The species composition of the dead foraminiferal assemblages were similar at both sites, however, and were dominated by Nuttallides umbonifera, Pullenia bulloides, and Melonis pompiloides. An exception was the “phytodetritus species” Epistominella exigua, which was more abundant at the eutrophic site, indicating a larger seasonal component to the export under the bloom region. Differences in the organic matter input regimes at the two sites appear to influence the abundance and diversity, but not the overall species composition, of the foraminiferal assemblages.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007
Keywords: Deep sea, Abyssal, Organic fluxes, Photosynthetic pigments, Total organic carbon, Benthic foraminifera

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 49522
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/49522
ISSN: 0967-0645
PURE UUID: 39727e89-760d-483e-a33d-3309320bc099

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Nov 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 09:57

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J.A. Hughes
Author: T. Smith
Author: F. Chaillan
Author: B.J. Bett
Author: D.S.M. Billett
Author: B. Boorman
Author: E.H. Fisher
Author: M. Frenz
Author: G.A. Wolff

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×