The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions

How military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions
How military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions
Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore how military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions, particularly when these differ from patients’ pain self-reports.
Background. Postoperative pain is a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors that make assessment difficult. Nurses are taught to believe what patients say about their pain. However, their attitudes to pain are influenced by their cultural background and they may disagree with patients’ self-reports. Military nurses belong to a military culture with different pain attitudes that may also influence their postoperative pain assessment.
Method. An ethnomethodological ethnography study was carried out in 2003. A purposive sample of 29 British military surgical/orthopaedic Registered Nurses were interviewed to identify their taken-for-granted assumptions and commonsense cultural knowledge surrounding postoperative pain assessment. The data were analysed using a systematic process of inductive reasoning aided by Non-numerical, Unstructured Data for Indexing, Searching and Theorizing (qsr n6, nud*ist).
Findings. Participants told two distinct stories in their postoperative pain narratives. The first, the cultural story, described how military nurses normally assess postoperative pain and revealed taken-for-granted assumptions surrounding this assessment. However, when military nurses believe that patients over- or under-report their pain, the cultural story was challenged through a collective story in which nurses used their commonsense knowledge to account for these differences.
Conclusion. Postoperative pain assessment within a military culture is complex, but all nurses need to be aware that their socialization into different nursing cultures may influence their attitudes to postoperative pain assessment.
attitudes, clinical decision-making, empirical research report, ethno-methodological ethnography, interviews, military nurses, pain assessment, post operative pain
0309-2402
601-611
Harper, Phil
dd383e00-579c-4876-a317-80897d633684
Ersser, Steven
09c17777-b01e-495e-b3ad-d7e4035b88e2
Gobbi, Mary
829a5669-2d52-44ef-be96-bc57bf20bea0
Harper, Phil
dd383e00-579c-4876-a317-80897d633684
Ersser, Steven
09c17777-b01e-495e-b3ad-d7e4035b88e2
Gobbi, Mary
829a5669-2d52-44ef-be96-bc57bf20bea0

Harper, Phil, Ersser, Steven and Gobbi, Mary (2007) How military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 59 (6), 601-611. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04369.x).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aim. This paper is a report of a study to explore how military nurses rationalize their postoperative pain assessment decisions, particularly when these differ from patients’ pain self-reports.
Background. Postoperative pain is a complex phenomenon influenced by many factors that make assessment difficult. Nurses are taught to believe what patients say about their pain. However, their attitudes to pain are influenced by their cultural background and they may disagree with patients’ self-reports. Military nurses belong to a military culture with different pain attitudes that may also influence their postoperative pain assessment.
Method. An ethnomethodological ethnography study was carried out in 2003. A purposive sample of 29 British military surgical/orthopaedic Registered Nurses were interviewed to identify their taken-for-granted assumptions and commonsense cultural knowledge surrounding postoperative pain assessment. The data were analysed using a systematic process of inductive reasoning aided by Non-numerical, Unstructured Data for Indexing, Searching and Theorizing (qsr n6, nud*ist).
Findings. Participants told two distinct stories in their postoperative pain narratives. The first, the cultural story, described how military nurses normally assess postoperative pain and revealed taken-for-granted assumptions surrounding this assessment. However, when military nurses believe that patients over- or under-report their pain, the cultural story was challenged through a collective story in which nurses used their commonsense knowledge to account for these differences.
Conclusion. Postoperative pain assessment within a military culture is complex, but all nurses need to be aware that their socialization into different nursing cultures may influence their attitudes to postoperative pain assessment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2007
Keywords: attitudes, clinical decision-making, empirical research report, ethno-methodological ethnography, interviews, military nurses, pain assessment, post operative pain

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 50128
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/50128
ISSN: 0309-2402
PURE UUID: d2582c62-5dd1-4586-be1a-a6ff34baeb04

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jan 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:03

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Phil Harper
Author: Steven Ersser
Author: Mary Gobbi

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×