The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Developing and implementing balanced incentive and risk sharing contracts

Developing and implementing balanced incentive and risk sharing contracts
Developing and implementing balanced incentive and risk sharing contracts
An important aspect of stakeholder management in construction projects is the contractual approach to managing risk and uncertainty. Chapman and Ward (2002) develops a balanced incentive and risk sharing (BIARS) contract, drawing on earlier research on management contracts, which lead to publications on risk allocation and risk sharing generally. This paper develops the BIARS contract concept further. It addresses choice of contract decisions as risk efficient choices in a best practice project risk management process concerned with the whole project lifecycle. It sets this discussion in the context of a range of popular contract choices, like fixed price, design and build (D&B), and design, build, finance and operate (DBFO). It was stimulated by the need to explain these ideas to a client using target contracts with unbalanced risk sharing, a common practice. Best practice requires a balanced approach, and the difference is significant. Best practice also involves a number of other relevant features. This paper concludes that full integration of contract choice decisions and other aspects of a best practice approach to risk management is practical and advantageous.
contract conditions, risk management
0144-6193
659-669
Chapman, Chris
a4f4805b-b67d-4c4c-856b-78e01a2c89a0
Ward, Stephen
ac1bf683-4186-44e7-9f5e-4193ee4d03cd
Chapman, Chris
a4f4805b-b67d-4c4c-856b-78e01a2c89a0
Ward, Stephen
ac1bf683-4186-44e7-9f5e-4193ee4d03cd

Chapman, Chris and Ward, Stephen (2008) Developing and implementing balanced incentive and risk sharing contracts. [in special issue: Stakeholder Management in Construction] Construction Management and Economics, 26 (6), 659-669. (doi:10.1080/01446190802014760).

Record type: Article

Abstract

An important aspect of stakeholder management in construction projects is the contractual approach to managing risk and uncertainty. Chapman and Ward (2002) develops a balanced incentive and risk sharing (BIARS) contract, drawing on earlier research on management contracts, which lead to publications on risk allocation and risk sharing generally. This paper develops the BIARS contract concept further. It addresses choice of contract decisions as risk efficient choices in a best practice project risk management process concerned with the whole project lifecycle. It sets this discussion in the context of a range of popular contract choices, like fixed price, design and build (D&B), and design, build, finance and operate (DBFO). It was stimulated by the need to explain these ideas to a client using target contracts with unbalanced risk sharing, a common practice. Best practice requires a balanced approach, and the difference is significant. Best practice also involves a number of other relevant features. This paper concludes that full integration of contract choice decisions and other aspects of a best practice approach to risk management is practical and advantageous.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

e-pub ahead of print date: 16 June 2008
Published date: June 2008
Keywords: contract conditions, risk management

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 51742
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/51742
ISSN: 0144-6193
PURE UUID: a56475cd-1b37-4b99-93e1-b68d4ab41c7c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:18

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Chris Chapman
Author: Stephen Ward

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×