The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Aerobic vs. anaerobic biological processes for the treatment of organically contaminated groundwater

Aerobic vs. anaerobic biological processes for the treatment of organically contaminated groundwater
Aerobic vs. anaerobic biological processes for the treatment of organically contaminated groundwater
This paper describes laboratory scale results of aerobic and anaerobic biological treatment studies conducted to evaluate the feasibility of treating ground water contaminated with an organic solvent consisting of an equal weight-mixture of methylethylketone and cyclohexanone. For this purpose, three alternatives were considered, namely a single-stage anaerobic baffled reactor, an activated sludge system, and an aerated lagoon. The study focused on determining and comparing the treatment efficiency of each of the three treatment processes under similar operating conditions. Aerobic processes proved to be more effective in treating the organically contaminated groundwater.
groundwater remediation, methylethylketone, cyclohexanone, biological processes, anaerobic baffled reactor, activated sludge, aerobic lagoon
0020-7233
287-311
El-Fadel, Mutasem
6206783b-f040-458f-90b6-2cb2c361d7ae
El-Fadel, Mutasem
6206783b-f040-458f-90b6-2cb2c361d7ae

El-Fadel, Mutasem (2001) Aerobic vs. anaerobic biological processes for the treatment of organically contaminated groundwater. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 58 (3), 287-311. (doi:10.1080/00207230108711333).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This paper describes laboratory scale results of aerobic and anaerobic biological treatment studies conducted to evaluate the feasibility of treating ground water contaminated with an organic solvent consisting of an equal weight-mixture of methylethylketone and cyclohexanone. For this purpose, three alternatives were considered, namely a single-stage anaerobic baffled reactor, an activated sludge system, and an aerated lagoon. The study focused on determining and comparing the treatment efficiency of each of the three treatment processes under similar operating conditions. Aerobic processes proved to be more effective in treating the organically contaminated groundwater.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: April 2001
Keywords: groundwater remediation, methylethylketone, cyclohexanone, biological processes, anaerobic baffled reactor, activated sludge, aerobic lagoon

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 52877
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/52877
ISSN: 0020-7233
PURE UUID: bbe6865b-2f7e-42fb-85b6-717e0af80d6d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 16 Jul 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Mutasem El-Fadel

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×