The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components

Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components
Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components
It is shown by classical simulation and experimentation that quantum artificial neural networks (QUANNs) are more efficient and in some cases more powerful than classical artificial neural networks (CLANNs) for a variety of experimental tasks. This effect is particularly noticeable with larger and more complex domains. The gain in efficiency is achieved with no generalisation loss in most cases. QUANNs are also more powerful than CLANNs, again for some of the tasks examined, in terms of what the network can learn. What is more, it appears that not all components of a QUANN architecture need to be quantum for these advantages to surface. It is demonstrated that a fully quantum neural network has no advantage over a partly quantum network and may in fact produce worse results. Overall, this work provides a first insight into the expected behaviour of individual components of QUANNs, if and when quantum hardware is ever built, and raises questions about the interface between quantum and classical components of future QUANNs.
0020-0255
231-255
Narayanan, Ajit
de76071a-3593-47e7-a4cd-05af42ed4ad6
Menneer, Tammy
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa
Narayanan, Ajit
de76071a-3593-47e7-a4cd-05af42ed4ad6
Menneer, Tammy
d684eaf6-1494-4004-9973-cb8ccc628efa

Narayanan, Ajit and Menneer, Tammy (2000) Quantum artificial neural networks: architectures and components. Information Sciences, 128 (3-4), 231-255. (doi:10.1016/S0020-0255(00)00055-4).

Record type: Article

Abstract

It is shown by classical simulation and experimentation that quantum artificial neural networks (QUANNs) are more efficient and in some cases more powerful than classical artificial neural networks (CLANNs) for a variety of experimental tasks. This effect is particularly noticeable with larger and more complex domains. The gain in efficiency is achieved with no generalisation loss in most cases. QUANNs are also more powerful than CLANNs, again for some of the tasks examined, in terms of what the network can learn. What is more, it appears that not all components of a QUANN architecture need to be quantum for these advantages to surface. It is demonstrated that a fully quantum neural network has no advantage over a partly quantum network and may in fact produce worse results. Overall, this work provides a first insight into the expected behaviour of individual components of QUANNs, if and when quantum hardware is ever built, and raises questions about the interface between quantum and classical components of future QUANNs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: October 2000

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 54915
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/54915
ISSN: 0020-0255
PURE UUID: 1b8892f8-456a-4cad-97e8-79df176e37ea

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Aug 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:51

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Ajit Narayanan
Author: Tammy Menneer

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×