The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Organizational geographies of corporate responsibility: a UK-US comparison of retailers' ethical trading initiatives

Organizational geographies of corporate responsibility: a UK-US comparison of retailers' ethical trading initiatives
Organizational geographies of corporate responsibility: a UK-US comparison of retailers' ethical trading initiatives
Ethical trade, involving corporate codes of conduct for sites of production, has become a key means through which labour in retailers’ global supply chains is regulated. Yet, there is evidence to suggest that retail corporations vary markedly in their approaches to ethical trade and that such variation is shaped, in part, by the national-institutional contexts in which retailers are based. This article explores this insight by evaluating the distinct roles played by multi-stakeholder initiatives for ethical trade in the UK and USA. While the UK's core multi-stakeholder initiative, the Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI), encompasses retailers from a variety of sectors and takes a developmental and continuous learning approach to ethical trade, the US multi-stakeholder initiatives are focussed more on corporate accountability based on compliance monitoring exclusively in the clothing sector. Given recent organisational attempts to foster transnational dialogue between multi-stakeholder initiatives, though, we argue that the precise ways in which national-institutional contexts shape retailers’ ethical trading approaches are fluid and mutable. We contribute to the literature on the governance of global supply chains, retailer power and corporate responsibility by emphasising the political significance of national-institutional environments. However, in line with notions of relational economic geography, we understand these national-institutional environments as active and dynamic contexts, and accentuate the coalitional ways in which nationally based organisations evolve in their home countries and go on to shape broader transnational agendas for ethical trade.
ethical trade, retailers, corporate responsibility, multi-stakeholder organisations
1468-2702
491-513
Hughes, Alex
e5d7a8d9-2c4c-4328-b625-70ce000df9bf
Buttle, Martin
1bc293af-d23f-4331-9c86-46c926bea08b
Wrigley, Neil
e8e2986a-fbf0-4b27-9eef-1b5e6a137805
Hughes, Alex
e5d7a8d9-2c4c-4328-b625-70ce000df9bf
Buttle, Martin
1bc293af-d23f-4331-9c86-46c926bea08b
Wrigley, Neil
e8e2986a-fbf0-4b27-9eef-1b5e6a137805

Hughes, Alex, Buttle, Martin and Wrigley, Neil (2007) Organizational geographies of corporate responsibility: a UK-US comparison of retailers' ethical trading initiatives. Journal of Economic Geography, 7 (4), 491-513. (doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm011).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Ethical trade, involving corporate codes of conduct for sites of production, has become a key means through which labour in retailers’ global supply chains is regulated. Yet, there is evidence to suggest that retail corporations vary markedly in their approaches to ethical trade and that such variation is shaped, in part, by the national-institutional contexts in which retailers are based. This article explores this insight by evaluating the distinct roles played by multi-stakeholder initiatives for ethical trade in the UK and USA. While the UK's core multi-stakeholder initiative, the Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI), encompasses retailers from a variety of sectors and takes a developmental and continuous learning approach to ethical trade, the US multi-stakeholder initiatives are focussed more on corporate accountability based on compliance monitoring exclusively in the clothing sector. Given recent organisational attempts to foster transnational dialogue between multi-stakeholder initiatives, though, we argue that the precise ways in which national-institutional contexts shape retailers’ ethical trading approaches are fluid and mutable. We contribute to the literature on the governance of global supply chains, retailer power and corporate responsibility by emphasising the political significance of national-institutional environments. However, in line with notions of relational economic geography, we understand these national-institutional environments as active and dynamic contexts, and accentuate the coalitional ways in which nationally based organisations evolve in their home countries and go on to shape broader transnational agendas for ethical trade.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Submitted date: 5 December 2006
Published date: 5 May 2007
Keywords: ethical trade, retailers, corporate responsibility, multi-stakeholder organisations

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 54930
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/54930
ISSN: 1468-2702
PURE UUID: 930cf0ee-e7d7-4052-b16a-18c5c59396b0
ORCID for Neil Wrigley: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3967-5668

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jul 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Alex Hughes
Author: Martin Buttle
Author: Neil Wrigley ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×