The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity.

Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity.
Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity.
This experiment investigated whether properties of the text being read affect binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Readers' binocular eye movements were recorded while they read sentences that contained high- and low-frequency words. In addition, half of the sentences were presented in normal case, and half were presented in alternating case (i.e., AlTeRnAtInG cAsE). Past research has suggested that the visual system tolerates less binocular fixation disparity with alternating than with normal case (Heller & Radach, 1999). While both word frequency and alternating case produced large effects on fixation durations on the target word, neither manipulation affected the magnitude of fixation disparity. It is concluded that linguistic and visual properties of the text being read do not influence binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Additional analyses also showed no difference in fixation disparity between reading and a nonlinguistic task. Implications of these results for split-fovea models of reading are discussed.
0272-4987
1614-1625
Juhasz, Barbara.J.
744803c0-09fb-498f-817f-ee926eaaaed7
Liversedge, Simon.P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
White, Sarah.J.
38a313eb-8f07-4c5e-af36-10044136d5e3
Rayner, Keith.
8a888795-4994-40f9-b908-41347d257ad2
Juhasz, Barbara.J.
744803c0-09fb-498f-817f-ee926eaaaed7
Liversedge, Simon.P.
3ebda3f3-d930-4f89-85d5-5654d8fe7dee
White, Sarah.J.
38a313eb-8f07-4c5e-af36-10044136d5e3
Rayner, Keith.
8a888795-4994-40f9-b908-41347d257ad2

Juhasz, Barbara.J., Liversedge, Simon.P., White, Sarah.J. and Rayner, Keith. (2006) Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity. Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology Section A - Human Experimental Psychology, 59 (9), 1614-1625. (doi:10.1080/17470210500497722).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This experiment investigated whether properties of the text being read affect binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Readers' binocular eye movements were recorded while they read sentences that contained high- and low-frequency words. In addition, half of the sentences were presented in normal case, and half were presented in alternating case (i.e., AlTeRnAtInG cAsE). Past research has suggested that the visual system tolerates less binocular fixation disparity with alternating than with normal case (Heller & Radach, 1999). While both word frequency and alternating case produced large effects on fixation durations on the target word, neither manipulation affected the magnitude of fixation disparity. It is concluded that linguistic and visual properties of the text being read do not influence binocular coordination of the eyes during reading. Additional analyses also showed no difference in fixation disparity between reading and a nonlinguistic task. Implications of these results for split-fovea models of reading are discussed.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55183
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55183
ISSN: 0272-4987
PURE UUID: ce63432b-92df-4500-bdfc-7e4e0d530dec

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Jul 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 10:52

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Barbara.J. Juhasz
Author: Simon.P. Liversedge
Author: Sarah.J. White
Author: Keith. Rayner

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×