The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Seasonal variations between sampling and classical mean turbulent heat flux estimates in the North Atlantic

Seasonal variations between sampling and classical mean turbulent heat flux estimates in the North Atlantic
Seasonal variations between sampling and classical mean turbulent heat flux estimates in the North Atlantic
The two commonly used statistical measures of the air-sea heat flux, the sampling and classical means, have been compared using hourly reports over a 7-year-period from a weather ship stationed in the NE Atlantic. The sampling mean is the average over all flux estimates in a given period, where individual flux estimates are determined from ship reports of meteorological variables using the well-known bulk formulae. The classical mean is the flux derived by substituting period-averaged values for each of the meteorological variables into the bulk formula (where the averaging period employed is the same as that over which the fluxes are to be determined). Monthly sampling and classical means are calculated for the latent and sensible heat fluxes. The monthly classical mean latent heat flux is found to overestimate the sampling mean by an amount which increases from 1–2 W m–2 in summer to 7 W m–2 in winter, on average, over the 7-year-period. In a given winter month, the excess may be as great as 15 W m–2, which represents about 10% of the latent heat flux. For the sensible heat flux, any seasonal variation between the two means is of the order of 1 W m–2 and is not significant compared to the interannual variation. The discrepancy between the two means for the latent heat flux is shown to arise primarily from a negative correlation between the wind speed and sea-air humidity difference, the effects of which are implicitly included in the sampling method but not in the classical. The influence of the dominant weather conditions on the sign and magnitude of this correlation are explored, and the large negative values that it takes in winter are found to depend on the typical track of the mid-latitude depressions with respect to the position sampled. In conclusion, it is suggested that sampling means should be employed where possible in future climatological studies.
flux, calculation, averaging, parameterisation, marine meteorology
0992-7689
1054-1064
Josey, S. A.
2252ab7f-5cd2-49fd-a951-aece44553d93
Kent, E. C.
ea23f6f0-ccf6-4702-a5c9-184e9c5d4427
Taylor, P. K.
00e165bc-d3f7-4cc1-a0d6-fb445e5bc961
Josey, S. A.
2252ab7f-5cd2-49fd-a951-aece44553d93
Kent, E. C.
ea23f6f0-ccf6-4702-a5c9-184e9c5d4427
Taylor, P. K.
00e165bc-d3f7-4cc1-a0d6-fb445e5bc961

Josey, S. A., Kent, E. C. and Taylor, P. K. (1995) Seasonal variations between sampling and classical mean turbulent heat flux estimates in the North Atlantic. Annales Geophysicae, 13, 1054-1064.

Record type: Article

Abstract

The two commonly used statistical measures of the air-sea heat flux, the sampling and classical means, have been compared using hourly reports over a 7-year-period from a weather ship stationed in the NE Atlantic. The sampling mean is the average over all flux estimates in a given period, where individual flux estimates are determined from ship reports of meteorological variables using the well-known bulk formulae. The classical mean is the flux derived by substituting period-averaged values for each of the meteorological variables into the bulk formula (where the averaging period employed is the same as that over which the fluxes are to be determined). Monthly sampling and classical means are calculated for the latent and sensible heat fluxes. The monthly classical mean latent heat flux is found to overestimate the sampling mean by an amount which increases from 1–2 W m–2 in summer to 7 W m–2 in winter, on average, over the 7-year-period. In a given winter month, the excess may be as great as 15 W m–2, which represents about 10% of the latent heat flux. For the sensible heat flux, any seasonal variation between the two means is of the order of 1 W m–2 and is not significant compared to the interannual variation. The discrepancy between the two means for the latent heat flux is shown to arise primarily from a negative correlation between the wind speed and sea-air humidity difference, the effects of which are implicitly included in the sampling method but not in the classical. The influence of the dominant weather conditions on the sign and magnitude of this correlation are explored, and the large negative values that it takes in winter are found to depend on the typical track of the mid-latitude depressions with respect to the position sampled. In conclusion, it is suggested that sampling means should be employed where possible in future climatological studies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1995
Keywords: flux, calculation, averaging, parameterisation, marine meteorology

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 55830
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/55830
ISSN: 0992-7689
PURE UUID: e18af55b-c629-4dbb-be00-50606f39a1b5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Aug 2008
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 21:06

Export record

Contributors

Author: S. A. Josey
Author: E. C. Kent
Author: P. K. Taylor

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×