The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods?

Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods?
Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods?
Quality assurance is integral to good teaching. It requires a commitment from students to provide regular feedback, and from teachers to analyze and act on information received. The organisation and analysis of student feedback is time-consuming and difficult to co-ordinate for a complex clinical course. Web-based feedback using a dedicated school web-site offers the advantage of ease of collation of student assessment ratings and comments. In Year 4 of the undergraduate course at Guys, Kings and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, web-based student feedback of large group teaching was compared with traditional paper based methods using response rates and quality of assessments. The preference of teachers for both methods was assessed and their comments sought. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods will be presented.
Graham, Helen
81ea8662-d074-4eee-ba47-2af3ac965b7c
Cobb, Stephanie
897bbf11-3c55-45da-90dc-15d58592fae1
Graham, Helen
81ea8662-d074-4eee-ba47-2af3ac965b7c
Cobb, Stephanie
897bbf11-3c55-45da-90dc-15d58592fae1

Graham, Helen and Cobb, Stephanie (1970) Web-based student feedback on large group teaching: how does it compare with traditional paper methods? Association for Medical Education in Europe Conference: Medical Education and Standards at a Time of Change, Berlin, Germany. 01 - 04 Sep 2001.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

Quality assurance is integral to good teaching. It requires a commitment from students to provide regular feedback, and from teachers to analyze and act on information received. The organisation and analysis of student feedback is time-consuming and difficult to co-ordinate for a complex clinical course. Web-based feedback using a dedicated school web-site offers the advantage of ease of collation of student assessment ratings and comments. In Year 4 of the undergraduate course at Guys, Kings and St Thomas’ School of Medicine, Kings College London, web-based student feedback of large group teaching was compared with traditional paper based methods using response rates and quality of assessments. The preference of teachers for both methods was assessed and their comments sought. The advantages and disadvantages of both methods will be presented.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 January 1970
Venue - Dates: Association for Medical Education in Europe Conference: Medical Education and Standards at a Time of Change, Berlin, Germany, 2001-09-01 - 2001-09-04

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 58473
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/58473
PURE UUID: cdffbf71-848f-43ee-8203-bc32de416875

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Aug 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 17:56

Export record

Contributors

Author: Helen Graham
Author: Stephanie Cobb

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×