The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women

The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women
The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women
SUMMARY: BMD and clinical risk factors predict hip and other osteoporotic fractures. The combination of clinical risk factors and BMD provide higher specificity and sensitivity than either alone.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESES: To develop a risk assessment tool based on clinical risk factors (CRFs) with and without BMD.
METHODS: Nine population-based studies were studied in which BMD and CRFs were documented at baseline. Poisson regression models were developed for hip fracture and other osteoporotic fractures, with and without hip BMD. Fracture risk was expressed as gradient of risk (GR, risk ratio/SD change in risk score).
RESULTS: CRFs alone predicted hip fracture with a GR of 2.1/SD at the age of 50 years and decreased with age. The use of BMD alone provided a higher GR (3.7/SD), and was improved further with the combined use of CRFs and BMD (4.2/SD). For other osteoporotic fractures, the GRs were lower than for hip fracture. The GR with CRFs alone was 1.4/SD at the age of 50 years, similar to that provided by BMD (GR = 1.4/SD) and was not markedly increased by the combination (GR = 1.4/SD). The performance characteristics of clinical risk factors with and without BMD were validated in eleven independent population-based cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The models developed provide the basis for the integrated use of validated clinical risk factors in men and women to aid in fracture risk prediction.
cohort, research, methods, risk, risk factors, disease, risk assessment, fractures, hip, women, bone
0937-941X
1033-1046
Kanis, J.A.
8da04a36-08a7-4310-b4b4-a6d432439587
Oden, A.
c018cdda-62cd-44a0-be3a-227484a568bb
Johnell, O.
633a35fb-6cd3-4df2-af7f-36303f64cf7a
Johansson, H.
05aa5476-bcb9-4b97-905e-00f1dfd9d691
De Laet, C.
22d6d32e-6844-42a2-abd0-6e17b4592971
Brown, J.
64c8be68-e3cb-49ff-b5b0-525db5f4bcd0
Burckhardt, P.
66f9ffd0-3abd-45cf-bb79-d4557dd37ea1
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Christiansen, C.
b1993f77-2024-4daf-b5d8-1ce837315564
Cummings, S.
a8cd256e-182f-43d1-b89d-5593d74e1cb8
Eisman, J.A.
58daa855-fccb-4956-b0b6-b47be5c05ecc
Fujiwara, S.
6b72bf43-a69d-4a09-93ee-cba668fa8c57
Gluer, C.
f426808d-c8c0-4b65-9e8d-d029ee021128
Goltzman, D.
802008bc-1944-40b8-8324-a955e96526c6
Hans, D.
1986bda6-590a-40af-8f44-825462b7305e
Krieg, M.A.
eb130083-1a1b-4e00-9ed3-e91f43830bb6
La Croix, A.
afbc2312-d67b-4433-b30b-93adecc0e748
McCloskey, E.
5211de37-303a-42f8-b24b-00c475264f78
Mellstrom, D.
43d24c2f-97e4-423a-acec-6a13b3d477d9
Melton, L.J.
a5204c5e-0f21-4f4d-9c45-4d1799fee52a
III Pols, H.
72a27a39-4d04-4c64-886b-fce48998001b
Reeve, J.
8f5bc093-0e10-42ca-8d4a-07c1eaace565
Sanders, K.
93bf8dc7-a93d-4542-9e67-7010a53b2e71
Schott, A.M.
0883c6d6-5181-40f1-9de7-56e192d9e656
Silman, A.
3111838f-93cd-4147-b89e-97f012240106
Torgerson, D.
9eb7003f-725d-47b5-9ff9-6afc20be983c
Van Staa, T.
7e263d59-ecc2-41f2-8b20-3f934d09c2c9
Watts, N.B.
c9df517c-166d-4ba1-8b9d-25947998a89f
Yoshimura, N.
a10d916f-afc1-4f89-a7e3-a690e16b4cdd
Kanis, J.A.
8da04a36-08a7-4310-b4b4-a6d432439587
Oden, A.
c018cdda-62cd-44a0-be3a-227484a568bb
Johnell, O.
633a35fb-6cd3-4df2-af7f-36303f64cf7a
Johansson, H.
05aa5476-bcb9-4b97-905e-00f1dfd9d691
De Laet, C.
22d6d32e-6844-42a2-abd0-6e17b4592971
Brown, J.
64c8be68-e3cb-49ff-b5b0-525db5f4bcd0
Burckhardt, P.
66f9ffd0-3abd-45cf-bb79-d4557dd37ea1
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Christiansen, C.
b1993f77-2024-4daf-b5d8-1ce837315564
Cummings, S.
a8cd256e-182f-43d1-b89d-5593d74e1cb8
Eisman, J.A.
58daa855-fccb-4956-b0b6-b47be5c05ecc
Fujiwara, S.
6b72bf43-a69d-4a09-93ee-cba668fa8c57
Gluer, C.
f426808d-c8c0-4b65-9e8d-d029ee021128
Goltzman, D.
802008bc-1944-40b8-8324-a955e96526c6
Hans, D.
1986bda6-590a-40af-8f44-825462b7305e
Krieg, M.A.
eb130083-1a1b-4e00-9ed3-e91f43830bb6
La Croix, A.
afbc2312-d67b-4433-b30b-93adecc0e748
McCloskey, E.
5211de37-303a-42f8-b24b-00c475264f78
Mellstrom, D.
43d24c2f-97e4-423a-acec-6a13b3d477d9
Melton, L.J.
a5204c5e-0f21-4f4d-9c45-4d1799fee52a
III Pols, H.
72a27a39-4d04-4c64-886b-fce48998001b
Reeve, J.
8f5bc093-0e10-42ca-8d4a-07c1eaace565
Sanders, K.
93bf8dc7-a93d-4542-9e67-7010a53b2e71
Schott, A.M.
0883c6d6-5181-40f1-9de7-56e192d9e656
Silman, A.
3111838f-93cd-4147-b89e-97f012240106
Torgerson, D.
9eb7003f-725d-47b5-9ff9-6afc20be983c
Van Staa, T.
7e263d59-ecc2-41f2-8b20-3f934d09c2c9
Watts, N.B.
c9df517c-166d-4ba1-8b9d-25947998a89f
Yoshimura, N.
a10d916f-afc1-4f89-a7e3-a690e16b4cdd

Kanis, J.A., Oden, A., Johnell, O., Johansson, H., De Laet, C., Brown, J., Burckhardt, P., Cooper, C., Christiansen, C., Cummings, S., Eisman, J.A., Fujiwara, S., Gluer, C., Goltzman, D., Hans, D., Krieg, M.A., La Croix, A., McCloskey, E., Mellstrom, D., Melton, L.J., III Pols, H., Reeve, J., Sanders, K., Schott, A.M., Silman, A., Torgerson, D., Van Staa, T., Watts, N.B. and Yoshimura, N. (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporosis International, 18 (8), 1033-1046. (doi:10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y).

Record type: Article

Abstract

SUMMARY: BMD and clinical risk factors predict hip and other osteoporotic fractures. The combination of clinical risk factors and BMD provide higher specificity and sensitivity than either alone.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESES: To develop a risk assessment tool based on clinical risk factors (CRFs) with and without BMD.
METHODS: Nine population-based studies were studied in which BMD and CRFs were documented at baseline. Poisson regression models were developed for hip fracture and other osteoporotic fractures, with and without hip BMD. Fracture risk was expressed as gradient of risk (GR, risk ratio/SD change in risk score).
RESULTS: CRFs alone predicted hip fracture with a GR of 2.1/SD at the age of 50 years and decreased with age. The use of BMD alone provided a higher GR (3.7/SD), and was improved further with the combined use of CRFs and BMD (4.2/SD). For other osteoporotic fractures, the GRs were lower than for hip fracture. The GR with CRFs alone was 1.4/SD at the age of 50 years, similar to that provided by BMD (GR = 1.4/SD) and was not markedly increased by the combination (GR = 1.4/SD). The performance characteristics of clinical risk factors with and without BMD were validated in eleven independent population-based cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: The models developed provide the basis for the integrated use of validated clinical risk factors in men and women to aid in fracture risk prediction.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2007
Keywords: cohort, research, methods, risk, risk factors, disease, risk assessment, fractures, hip, women, bone

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61275
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61275
ISSN: 0937-941X
PURE UUID: 3e933cd7-214c-4353-9c7c-7e3018b57eb5
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2008
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J.A. Kanis
Author: A. Oden
Author: O. Johnell
Author: H. Johansson
Author: C. De Laet
Author: J. Brown
Author: P. Burckhardt
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: C. Christiansen
Author: S. Cummings
Author: J.A. Eisman
Author: S. Fujiwara
Author: C. Gluer
Author: D. Goltzman
Author: D. Hans
Author: M.A. Krieg
Author: A. La Croix
Author: E. McCloskey
Author: D. Mellstrom
Author: L.J. Melton
Author: H. III Pols
Author: J. Reeve
Author: K. Sanders
Author: A.M. Schott
Author: A. Silman
Author: D. Torgerson
Author: T. Van Staa
Author: N.B. Watts
Author: N. Yoshimura

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×