The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study

Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study
Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study
BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. METHODS: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes
neck, bone resorption, risk, femur, arm, vertebral fracture, methods, osteoporosis, incidence, bone, hip, analysis, women, spine, postmenopausal women, safety
0003-4967
654-661
Reginster, J.Y.
4083b457-5347-4ece-a53e-af19c8868c42
Adami, S.
4e8b8772-f6ad-4ed6-8629-6ed35cd921fd
Lakatos, P.
0583c415-ddb8-40ea-9641-c9473dfc7523
Greenwald, M.
d06fa8e7-85b4-480a-a43f-fa0107c71375
Stepan, J.J.
4db04e6d-013d-4700-89ba-d5b9048366e6
Silverman, S.L.
2b240cfc-5a4a-4261-8489-ea2d5ed24cdc
Christiansen, C.
b1993f77-2024-4daf-b5d8-1ce837315564
Rowell, L.
2600c85e-8df2-42fa-9fbf-948b75f949e7
Mairon, N.
6821298a-35d0-4044-ad00-c3c8a6e21d7f
Bonvoisin, B.
2921fbf6-f688-49a2-aa1f-d337720c382f
Drezner, M.K.
7fd5e0d0-2bf5-409f-9daf-1e6a58832b84
Emkey, R.
d36832ac-ee62-4321-abd0-51fa49f0e14c
Felsenberg, D.
a8f19c6b-0781-4071-bfce-442eaa59e9bf
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Delmas, P.D.
f1454c14-9506-42f9-a989-bcb82ffbec46
Miller, P.D.
f62a34a2-4bd2-413f-bd3b-a9357e2ea13e
Reginster, J.Y.
4083b457-5347-4ece-a53e-af19c8868c42
Adami, S.
4e8b8772-f6ad-4ed6-8629-6ed35cd921fd
Lakatos, P.
0583c415-ddb8-40ea-9641-c9473dfc7523
Greenwald, M.
d06fa8e7-85b4-480a-a43f-fa0107c71375
Stepan, J.J.
4db04e6d-013d-4700-89ba-d5b9048366e6
Silverman, S.L.
2b240cfc-5a4a-4261-8489-ea2d5ed24cdc
Christiansen, C.
b1993f77-2024-4daf-b5d8-1ce837315564
Rowell, L.
2600c85e-8df2-42fa-9fbf-948b75f949e7
Mairon, N.
6821298a-35d0-4044-ad00-c3c8a6e21d7f
Bonvoisin, B.
2921fbf6-f688-49a2-aa1f-d337720c382f
Drezner, M.K.
7fd5e0d0-2bf5-409f-9daf-1e6a58832b84
Emkey, R.
d36832ac-ee62-4321-abd0-51fa49f0e14c
Felsenberg, D.
a8f19c6b-0781-4071-bfce-442eaa59e9bf
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Delmas, P.D.
f1454c14-9506-42f9-a989-bcb82ffbec46
Miller, P.D.
f62a34a2-4bd2-413f-bd3b-a9357e2ea13e

Reginster, J.Y., Adami, S., Lakatos, P., Greenwald, M., Stepan, J.J., Silverman, S.L., Christiansen, C., Rowell, L., Mairon, N., Bonvoisin, B., Drezner, M.K., Emkey, R., Felsenberg, D., Cooper, C., Delmas, P.D. and Miller, P.D. (2006) Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 65 (5), 654-661. (doi:10.1136/ard.2005.044958).

Record type: Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing bisphosphonate dosing frequency may improve suboptimal adherence to treatment and therefore therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Once-monthly oral ibandronate has been developed to overcome this problem. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the 1 year results and provide more extensive safety and tolerability information for once-monthly dosing by a 2 year analysis. METHODS: MOBILE, a randomised, phase III, non-inferiority study, compared the efficacy and safety of once-monthly ibandronate with daily ibandronate, which has previously been shown to reduce vertebral fracture risk in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 1609 postmenopausal women were randomised. Substantial increases in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) were seen in all treatment arms: 5.0%, 5.3%, 5.6%, and 6.6% in the daily and once-monthly groups (50 + 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg), respectively. It was confirmed that all once-monthly regimens were at least as effective as daily treatment, and in addition, 150 mg was found to be better (p<0.001). Substantial increases in proximal femur (total hip, femoral neck, trochanter) BMD were seen; 150 mg produced the most pronounced effect (p<0.05 versus daily treatment). Independent of the regimen, most participants (70.5-93.5%) achieved increases above baseline in lumbar spine or total hip BMD, or both. Pronounced decreases in the biochemical marker of bone resorption, sCTX, observed in all arms after 3 months, were maintained throughout. The 150 mg regimen consistently produced greater increases in BMD and sCTX suppression than the 100 mg and daily regimens. Ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-monthly oral ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as daily treatment. Once-monthly administration may be more convenient for patients and improve therapeutic adherence, thereby optimising outcomes

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006
Keywords: neck, bone resorption, risk, femur, arm, vertebral fracture, methods, osteoporosis, incidence, bone, hip, analysis, women, spine, postmenopausal women, safety

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61459
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61459
ISSN: 0003-4967
PURE UUID: 154c705d-2864-4cdb-9593-87d90158aaa2
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 05 Sep 2008
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J.Y. Reginster
Author: S. Adami
Author: P. Lakatos
Author: M. Greenwald
Author: J.J. Stepan
Author: S.L. Silverman
Author: C. Christiansen
Author: L. Rowell
Author: N. Mairon
Author: B. Bonvoisin
Author: M.K. Drezner
Author: R. Emkey
Author: D. Felsenberg
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD
Author: P.D. Delmas
Author: P.D. Miller

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×