The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) and Diabetes-UK survey of specialist diabetes services in the UK, 2006. 1. The consultant physician perspective

Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) and Diabetes-UK survey of specialist diabetes services in the UK, 2006. 1. The consultant physician perspective
Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) and Diabetes-UK survey of specialist diabetes services in the UK, 2006. 1. The consultant physician perspective
AIMS: To identify the views and working practices of consultant diabetologists in the UK in 2006-2007, the current provision of specialist services, and to examine changes since 2000.

METHODS: All 592 UK consultant diabetologists were invited to participate in an on-line survey. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of responses were undertaken. A composite 'well-resourced service score' was calculated. In addition to an analysis of all respondents, a sub-analysis was undertaken, comparing localities represented both in 2006/2007 and in 2000.

RESULTS: In 2006/2007, a 49% response rate was achieved, representing 50% of acute National Health Service Trusts. Staffing levels had improved, but remained below recommendations made in 2000. Ten percent of specialist services were still provided by single-handed consultants, especially in Northern Ireland (in 50% of responses, P = 0.001 vs. other nations). Antenatal, joint adult-paediatric and ophthalmology sub-specialist diabetes services and availability of biochemical tests had improved since 2000, but access to psychology services had declined. Almost 90% of consultants had no clinical engagement in providing community diabetes services. The 'well-resourced service score' had not improved since 2000. There was continued evidence of disparity in resources between the nations (lowest in Wales and Northern Ireland, P = 0.007), between regions in England (lowest in the East Midlands and the Eastern regions, P = 0.028), and in centres with a single-handed consultant service (P = 0.001). Job satisfaction correlated with well-resourced service score (P = 0.001). The main concerns and threats to specialist services were deficiencies in psychology access, inadequate staffing, lack of progress in commissioning, and the detrimental impact of central policy on specialist services.

CONCLUSIONS: There are continued disparities in specialist service provision. Without effective commissioning and adequate specialist team staffing, integrated diabetes care will remain unattainable in many regions, regardless of reconfigurations and alternative service models
commissioning, consultant diabetologists, diabetes, national service framework, specialist services
0742-3071
643-650
Winocour, P.H.
edc400cc-16c4-4a0b-9a35-85eb5118335a
Gosden, C.
f8bf5d95-e55a-4b40-b09d-6537b4c2a0b3
Walton, C.
5b542bc7-7333-4e4a-9cf5-937fb449da66
Nagi, D.
064cc98d-478a-498a-9dc7-5bc4f34a70bf
Turner, B.
de2c6fb8-a72d-4d79-bf9a-b46b2807690b
Williams, R.
49181762-00c1-4043-9247-a9bcddbd04f7
James, J.
96fb7e32-f0cc-4cc5-9d34-1f3687379bb6
Holt, R.I.
d54202e1-fcf6-4a17-a320-9f32d7024393
Winocour, P.H.
edc400cc-16c4-4a0b-9a35-85eb5118335a
Gosden, C.
f8bf5d95-e55a-4b40-b09d-6537b4c2a0b3
Walton, C.
5b542bc7-7333-4e4a-9cf5-937fb449da66
Nagi, D.
064cc98d-478a-498a-9dc7-5bc4f34a70bf
Turner, B.
de2c6fb8-a72d-4d79-bf9a-b46b2807690b
Williams, R.
49181762-00c1-4043-9247-a9bcddbd04f7
James, J.
96fb7e32-f0cc-4cc5-9d34-1f3687379bb6
Holt, R.I.
d54202e1-fcf6-4a17-a320-9f32d7024393

Winocour, P.H., Gosden, C., Walton, C., Nagi, D., Turner, B., Williams, R., James, J. and Holt, R.I. (2008) Association of British Clinical Diabetologists (ABCD) and Diabetes-UK survey of specialist diabetes services in the UK, 2006. 1. The consultant physician perspective. Diabetic Medicine, 25 (6), 643-650. (doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02449.x). (PMID:18544101)

Record type: Article

Abstract

AIMS: To identify the views and working practices of consultant diabetologists in the UK in 2006-2007, the current provision of specialist services, and to examine changes since 2000.

METHODS: All 592 UK consultant diabetologists were invited to participate in an on-line survey. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of responses were undertaken. A composite 'well-resourced service score' was calculated. In addition to an analysis of all respondents, a sub-analysis was undertaken, comparing localities represented both in 2006/2007 and in 2000.

RESULTS: In 2006/2007, a 49% response rate was achieved, representing 50% of acute National Health Service Trusts. Staffing levels had improved, but remained below recommendations made in 2000. Ten percent of specialist services were still provided by single-handed consultants, especially in Northern Ireland (in 50% of responses, P = 0.001 vs. other nations). Antenatal, joint adult-paediatric and ophthalmology sub-specialist diabetes services and availability of biochemical tests had improved since 2000, but access to psychology services had declined. Almost 90% of consultants had no clinical engagement in providing community diabetes services. The 'well-resourced service score' had not improved since 2000. There was continued evidence of disparity in resources between the nations (lowest in Wales and Northern Ireland, P = 0.007), between regions in England (lowest in the East Midlands and the Eastern regions, P = 0.028), and in centres with a single-handed consultant service (P = 0.001). Job satisfaction correlated with well-resourced service score (P = 0.001). The main concerns and threats to specialist services were deficiencies in psychology access, inadequate staffing, lack of progress in commissioning, and the detrimental impact of central policy on specialist services.

CONCLUSIONS: There are continued disparities in specialist service provision. Without effective commissioning and adequate specialist team staffing, integrated diabetes care will remain unattainable in many regions, regardless of reconfigurations and alternative service models

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2008
Keywords: commissioning, consultant diabetologists, diabetes, national service framework, specialist services

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61614
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61614
ISSN: 0742-3071
PURE UUID: 05acde0d-9eaf-4a33-81d9-842f641bd85d
ORCID for R.I. Holt: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0001-8911-6744

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P.H. Winocour
Author: C. Gosden
Author: C. Walton
Author: D. Nagi
Author: B. Turner
Author: R. Williams
Author: J. James
Author: R.I. Holt ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×