The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Understanding homeopathic decision-making: a qualitative study

Understanding homeopathic decision-making: a qualitative study
Understanding homeopathic decision-making: a qualitative study
Background: understanding how homeopaths make clinical decisions is important in terms of optimising patient care, yet currently little is understood about this process. Most current literature investigating decision-making has focussed on conventional medicine; to date only two studies, both quantitative, have explored this area, with both studies investigating this in homeopathy. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how homeopaths make prescribing decisions primarily during their first consultation with a patient.

Method: in-depth, semistructured, face to face interviews were carried out with 14 private homeopaths working in private practice. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was carried out on the data by 3 researchers.

Findings: cognitive processes that homeopaths used in decision-making emerged from the analysis included the use of pattern recognition (P), hypothetico-deductive reasoning (H) and intuition (I), which led to a precise remedy match (R-M). Four themes emerged from the data: three related to the process of making a decision; one theme to those factors that influence this process. These themes fitted into a decision-making model, which we describe: the P.H.I.RM decision-making model. Two further themes emerged, which contributed to the model: the practitioners' awareness of avoiding major bias and the role of the patient practitioner relationship in influencing decision-making. Conclusion: The P.H.I.R-M decision-making model describes how homeopathic practitioners' used an evidence-based process to make decisions. This study also contributes more weight to the accumulating evidence that intuition is a valuable component of decisionmaking for homeopathic practitioners.
qualitative study, interpretative phenomenological analysis, decision-making, homeopathy, practitioner
1661-4119
218-225
Burch, Alexandra L.
4e8e97cd-7bc3-4efd-857e-20790040b80f
Dibb, Bridget
1cdc4ce1-7f8e-4c21-80ed-c3a48cdae209
Burch, Alexandra L.
4e8e97cd-7bc3-4efd-857e-20790040b80f
Dibb, Bridget
1cdc4ce1-7f8e-4c21-80ed-c3a48cdae209

Burch, Alexandra L. and Dibb, Bridget (2008) Understanding homeopathic decision-making: a qualitative study. Complementary Medicine Research, 15 (4), 218-225. (doi:10.1159/000138511). (PMID:18787331)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: understanding how homeopaths make clinical decisions is important in terms of optimising patient care, yet currently little is understood about this process. Most current literature investigating decision-making has focussed on conventional medicine; to date only two studies, both quantitative, have explored this area, with both studies investigating this in homeopathy. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore how homeopaths make prescribing decisions primarily during their first consultation with a patient.

Method: in-depth, semistructured, face to face interviews were carried out with 14 private homeopaths working in private practice. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was carried out on the data by 3 researchers.

Findings: cognitive processes that homeopaths used in decision-making emerged from the analysis included the use of pattern recognition (P), hypothetico-deductive reasoning (H) and intuition (I), which led to a precise remedy match (R-M). Four themes emerged from the data: three related to the process of making a decision; one theme to those factors that influence this process. These themes fitted into a decision-making model, which we describe: the P.H.I.RM decision-making model. Two further themes emerged, which contributed to the model: the practitioners' awareness of avoiding major bias and the role of the patient practitioner relationship in influencing decision-making. Conclusion: The P.H.I.R-M decision-making model describes how homeopathic practitioners' used an evidence-based process to make decisions. This study also contributes more weight to the accumulating evidence that intuition is a valuable component of decisionmaking for homeopathic practitioners.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2008
Keywords: qualitative study, interpretative phenomenological analysis, decision-making, homeopathy, practitioner

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61687
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61687
ISSN: 1661-4119
PURE UUID: 861e97e4-482f-4198-9800-781bb3041e87
ORCID for Alexandra L. Burch: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1120-2364

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 17 Sep 2008
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:19

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Bridget Dibb

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×