The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Attitudes of general practitioners and community mental health team staff towards the locus of care for people with chronic psychotic disorders

Attitudes of general practitioners and community mental health team staff towards the locus of care for people with chronic psychotic disorders
Attitudes of general practitioners and community mental health team staff towards the locus of care for people with chronic psychotic disorders
Shared care of the long-term mentally ill (LTMI) has long been advocated but little is known about the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and mental health workers (MHWs) towards the locus of care of these patients. In order to compare MHWs' and GPs' attitudes towards the care of patients with chronic psychosis, in 1998 52 GPs and 58 MHWs involved in a study which was conducted in three London boroughs about the locus of care for people with chronic psychotic disorders were asked to complete postal questionnaires. These questionnaires examined the issues of responsibility for both mental and physical care, difficulties in providing care and professional satisfaction. There was agreement that psychiatric teams should take overall responsibility for these patients, although in most cases 'care should be shared'. The results showed that the MHWs wanted GPs to take more responsibility for physical treatment than the GPs themselves wanted, that the GPs had mixed feelings about relapse monitoring and that the MHWs found patients with chronic psychosis more rewarding and less difficult to work with. A comparison with a 1991 study of GPs showed little change. However, despite recent adverse publicity, a higher proportion of the GPs in 1998 agreed that these patients are better off in the community, The GPs and MHWs generally agreed on the roles they should take in the management of patients with chronic psychosis but some important differences remain
attitudes, care, practitioners, attitude, people, treatment, london, disorder, psychosis, gps, england, role, psychiatry, burns, questionnaire, patients, primary care, disorders, chronic, health, ltmi, shared care, primary-care, community, mentally ill, questionnaires
1355-2570
67-71
Burns, T.
f570817b-410b-491a-a4d1-ed943149ef6b
Greenwood, N.
499b047b-f94d-4d8e-a5e9-79770c5d107d
Kendrick, T.
1aee2919-abd7-452c-8a0f-5b1ed22d58b3
Burns, T.
f570817b-410b-491a-a4d1-ed943149ef6b
Greenwood, N.
499b047b-f94d-4d8e-a5e9-79770c5d107d
Kendrick, T.
1aee2919-abd7-452c-8a0f-5b1ed22d58b3

Burns, T., Greenwood, N. and Kendrick, T. (2000) Attitudes of general practitioners and community mental health team staff towards the locus of care for people with chronic psychotic disorders. Primary Care Psychiatry, 6 (2), 67-71.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Shared care of the long-term mentally ill (LTMI) has long been advocated but little is known about the attitudes of general practitioners (GPs) and mental health workers (MHWs) towards the locus of care of these patients. In order to compare MHWs' and GPs' attitudes towards the care of patients with chronic psychosis, in 1998 52 GPs and 58 MHWs involved in a study which was conducted in three London boroughs about the locus of care for people with chronic psychotic disorders were asked to complete postal questionnaires. These questionnaires examined the issues of responsibility for both mental and physical care, difficulties in providing care and professional satisfaction. There was agreement that psychiatric teams should take overall responsibility for these patients, although in most cases 'care should be shared'. The results showed that the MHWs wanted GPs to take more responsibility for physical treatment than the GPs themselves wanted, that the GPs had mixed feelings about relapse monitoring and that the MHWs found patients with chronic psychosis more rewarding and less difficult to work with. A comparison with a 1991 study of GPs showed little change. However, despite recent adverse publicity, a higher proportion of the GPs in 1998 agreed that these patients are better off in the community, The GPs and MHWs generally agreed on the roles they should take in the management of patients with chronic psychosis but some important differences remain

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: June 2000
Keywords: attitudes, care, practitioners, attitude, people, treatment, london, disorder, psychosis, gps, england, role, psychiatry, burns, questionnaire, patients, primary care, disorders, chronic, health, ltmi, shared care, primary-care, community, mentally ill, questionnaires

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61698
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61698
ISSN: 1355-2570
PURE UUID: 4ccd3f4f-eb08-447e-91d7-e66fe48e01a1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 01 Sep 2008
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 21:15

Export record

Contributors

Author: T. Burns
Author: N. Greenwood
Author: T. Kendrick

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×