The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial

Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial
Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether screening improves the detection of atrial fibrillation (cluster randomisation) and to compare systematic and opportunistic screening.

DESIGN: Multicentred cluster randomised controlled trial, with subsidiary trial embedded within the intervention arm.

SETTING: 50 primary care centres in England, with further individual randomisation of patients in the intervention practices.

PARTICIPANTS: 14,802 patients aged 65 or over in 25 intervention and 25 control practices.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients in intervention practices were randomly allocated to systematic screening (invitation for electrocardiography) or opportunistic screening (pulse taking and invitation for electrocardiography if the pulse was irregular). Screening took place over 12 months in each practice from October 2001 to February 2003. No active screening took place in control practices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Newly identified atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: The detection rate of new cases of atrial fibrillation was 1.63% a year in the intervention practices and 1.04% in control practices (difference 0.59%, 95% confidence interval 0.20% to 0.98%). Systematic and opportunistic screening detected similar numbers of new cases (1.62% v 1.64%, difference 0.02%, -0.5% to 0.5%).

CONCLUSION: Active screening for atrial fibrillation detects additional cases over current practice. The preferred method of screening in patients aged 65 or over in primary care is opportunistic pulse taking with follow-up electrocardiography.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19633732 [controlled-trials.com]
family practice, epidemiology, patients, primary care, prevalence, screening, england, cluster analysis, prognosis, multicenter studies, registration, outcome, care, controlled trial, primary-care, controlled-trial, diagnosis, nurse practitioners, mass screening, trial, research, general-practice, methods, aged, intervention, follow up, general practice, design, follow-up, randomized controlled trial, atrial fibrillation, electrocardiography, humans, pulse, research support, arm
0959-8138
1-6
Fitzmaurice, D.A.
765c89e3-8d55-4dea-a9de-980169a56d40
Hobbs, F.D.
9a0f0240-ff92-43ed-882a-2c3be3472559
Jowett, S.
38449c5e-2494-4c7f-b7ae-1e938696460b
Mant, J.
6a0e609a-4737-49ca-b0df-ae8d53e810e1
Murray, E.T.
17303905-7cbf-4f8d-ac9c-c1610ddab51b
Holder, R.
0af92b79-7fd3-42f6-b211-2e9f0b68607e
Raftery, J.P.
27c2661d-6c4f-448a-bf36-9a89ec72bd6b
Bryan, S.
4d0e46f3-c722-40d6-81ba-10fc3ed7e17b
Davies, M.
ad39b2b8-121a-49ee-8e4a-daf601ba7fe6
Lip, G.Y.H.
f1ddbcac-8524-4ae3-b6d2-a061866e6ab9
Allan, T.F.
7fbfc515-7b13-4f8a-8f16-d819f1a3570f
Fitzmaurice, D.A.
765c89e3-8d55-4dea-a9de-980169a56d40
Hobbs, F.D.
9a0f0240-ff92-43ed-882a-2c3be3472559
Jowett, S.
38449c5e-2494-4c7f-b7ae-1e938696460b
Mant, J.
6a0e609a-4737-49ca-b0df-ae8d53e810e1
Murray, E.T.
17303905-7cbf-4f8d-ac9c-c1610ddab51b
Holder, R.
0af92b79-7fd3-42f6-b211-2e9f0b68607e
Raftery, J.P.
27c2661d-6c4f-448a-bf36-9a89ec72bd6b
Bryan, S.
4d0e46f3-c722-40d6-81ba-10fc3ed7e17b
Davies, M.
ad39b2b8-121a-49ee-8e4a-daf601ba7fe6
Lip, G.Y.H.
f1ddbcac-8524-4ae3-b6d2-a061866e6ab9
Allan, T.F.
7fbfc515-7b13-4f8a-8f16-d819f1a3570f

Fitzmaurice, D.A., Hobbs, F.D., Jowett, S., Mant, J., Murray, E.T., Holder, R., Raftery, J.P., Bryan, S., Davies, M., Lip, G.Y.H. and Allan, T.F. (2007) Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 335 (7616), 1-6. (doi:10.1136/bmj.39280.660567.55).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether screening improves the detection of atrial fibrillation (cluster randomisation) and to compare systematic and opportunistic screening.

DESIGN: Multicentred cluster randomised controlled trial, with subsidiary trial embedded within the intervention arm.

SETTING: 50 primary care centres in England, with further individual randomisation of patients in the intervention practices.

PARTICIPANTS: 14,802 patients aged 65 or over in 25 intervention and 25 control practices.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients in intervention practices were randomly allocated to systematic screening (invitation for electrocardiography) or opportunistic screening (pulse taking and invitation for electrocardiography if the pulse was irregular). Screening took place over 12 months in each practice from October 2001 to February 2003. No active screening took place in control practices.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Newly identified atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: The detection rate of new cases of atrial fibrillation was 1.63% a year in the intervention practices and 1.04% in control practices (difference 0.59%, 95% confidence interval 0.20% to 0.98%). Systematic and opportunistic screening detected similar numbers of new cases (1.62% v 1.64%, difference 0.02%, -0.5% to 0.5%).

CONCLUSION: Active screening for atrial fibrillation detects additional cases over current practice. The preferred method of screening in patients aged 65 or over in primary care is opportunistic pulse taking with follow-up electrocardiography.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN19633732 [controlled-trials.com]

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 25 August 2007
Keywords: family practice, epidemiology, patients, primary care, prevalence, screening, england, cluster analysis, prognosis, multicenter studies, registration, outcome, care, controlled trial, primary-care, controlled-trial, diagnosis, nurse practitioners, mass screening, trial, research, general-practice, methods, aged, intervention, follow up, general practice, design, follow-up, randomized controlled trial, atrial fibrillation, electrocardiography, humans, pulse, research support, arm

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 61778
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/61778
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 398b3fff-c9d5-4ad7-aae7-a44df7e8caae

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 09 Sep 2008
Last modified: 14 Oct 2024 17:01

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: D.A. Fitzmaurice
Author: F.D. Hobbs
Author: S. Jowett
Author: J. Mant
Author: E.T. Murray
Author: R. Holder
Author: J.P. Raftery
Author: S. Bryan
Author: M. Davies
Author: G.Y.H. Lip
Author: T.F. Allan

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×