The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care

Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care
Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care
Background

The inter-rater reliability of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) has not been examined in primary care settings with a view to using it as both a primary outcome measure and for determining entry into a trial.

Methods

A semi-structured interview for the HDRS with detailed questions and scoring rules was developed for use by lay interviewers. Interviews with patients with a range of scores on the HDRS were conducted by one interviewer, audiotaped and rated by a second interviewer. 84 ratings were made by 4 raters on 42 primary care patients over 4 sessions, giving comparisons for 10 rater pairs.

Results

The intraclass coefficient and concordance coefficient for the total HDRS score were both 0.95, with a 95% reference interval for the difference (between any pair of raters) in total HDRS score of ? 3.31 to 3.69; measurement error in an individual total score was 1.25. Inter-rater reliability did not vary with severity of depression and there was no evidence of bias in rating in any rater compared to the others. Weighted kappa coefficients for individual items were close to 0.6 (good) or above for all items except hypochondriasis and insight.

Limitations

The inter-rater reliability of the retardation and agitation items was not assessed.

Conclusions

In primary care, the 17-item HDRS delivered using a standardised interview has high overall inter-rater reliability as a primary outcome measure but a few patients may be erroneously excluded if it is used to determine study entry.
depression, primary care, reliability, psychometrics
0165-0327
204-213
Morriss, Richard
fb48ce6f-f557-4e5d-a309-5eb7f6ee6c2e
Leese, Morven
0bd95098-5280-41b4-91cf-c7ed9dd272c7
Chatwin, Judy
c828a7b0-e6c6-4229-b7b3-384feb083b76
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e
The THREAD Study Group
Morriss, Richard
fb48ce6f-f557-4e5d-a309-5eb7f6ee6c2e
Leese, Morven
0bd95098-5280-41b4-91cf-c7ed9dd272c7
Chatwin, Judy
c828a7b0-e6c6-4229-b7b3-384feb083b76
Baldwin, David
1beaa192-0ef1-4914-897a-3a49fc2ed15e

Morriss, Richard, Leese, Morven, Chatwin, Judy and Baldwin, David , The THREAD Study Group (2008) Inter-rater reliability of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as a diagnostic and outcome measure of depression in primary care. Journal of Affective Disorders, 111 (2-3), 204-213. (doi:10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.013). (PMID:18374987)

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background

The inter-rater reliability of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) has not been examined in primary care settings with a view to using it as both a primary outcome measure and for determining entry into a trial.

Methods

A semi-structured interview for the HDRS with detailed questions and scoring rules was developed for use by lay interviewers. Interviews with patients with a range of scores on the HDRS were conducted by one interviewer, audiotaped and rated by a second interviewer. 84 ratings were made by 4 raters on 42 primary care patients over 4 sessions, giving comparisons for 10 rater pairs.

Results

The intraclass coefficient and concordance coefficient for the total HDRS score were both 0.95, with a 95% reference interval for the difference (between any pair of raters) in total HDRS score of ? 3.31 to 3.69; measurement error in an individual total score was 1.25. Inter-rater reliability did not vary with severity of depression and there was no evidence of bias in rating in any rater compared to the others. Weighted kappa coefficients for individual items were close to 0.6 (good) or above for all items except hypochondriasis and insight.

Limitations

The inter-rater reliability of the retardation and agitation items was not assessed.

Conclusions

In primary care, the 17-item HDRS delivered using a standardised interview has high overall inter-rater reliability as a primary outcome measure but a few patients may be erroneously excluded if it is used to determine study entry.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: December 2008
Keywords: depression, primary care, reliability, psychometrics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62001
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62001
ISSN: 0165-0327
PURE UUID: 117c5e69-7e52-468f-aa2d-5df6eaa61e49
ORCID for David Baldwin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-0907

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 15 Apr 2009
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:48

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Richard Morriss
Author: Morven Leese
Author: Judy Chatwin
Author: David Baldwin ORCID iD
Corporate Author: The THREAD Study Group

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×