The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial
Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial
Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bony non-union has been used in different forms for many years. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty about its efficacy. We, therefore, undertook a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial to try and determine its effect. Over a period of 5 years, 34 consecutive patients with a tibial non-union met our "criteria for inclusion". Each patient had an oblique fibular osteotomy, followed by a unilateral external fixator. They were then randomly allocated one of two machines. Group 1, the active group, received electrical stimulation from an active machine. Group 2, the dummy group, had an identical machine but without any current passing through the active coils. They were then followed up for 6 months and evaluated clinically and radiologically for bony union. Unfortunately, there was by chance, an imbalance in smoking habit between the two groups. The union rate in the subgroup that smoked was 75% (6/8) in the active group as compared to 46% (6/13) in the dummy group. The active group of non-smokers had 100% (10/10) union rate, compared to 67% (2/3) in the dummy group. Overall 24 out of the 34 patients progressed to union. Out of 18, 16 (89%) in the active group showed bony union as compared to 8/16 (50%) in the dummy. There was, thus, a statistically significant positive association between tibial union and electrical stimulation (odds ratio 8, 95% CI: 1.5-41, P=0.02)
trial, osteotomy, efficacy, controlled-trial, radiography, stimulation, methods, odds ratio, smoking, adult, patients, double-blind trial, double-blind, clinical-trial, male, nhs, humans, therapy, adolescent, female, electric stimulation therapy, double-blind method, electromagnetic fields, ununited, hospitals, controlled trial, middle aged, tibial fractures, prospective studies, treatment outcome, fractures, treatment
0020-1383
357-362
Simonis, R.B.
4aaa9725-0f2d-4895-a169-75322deb1118
Parnell, E.J.
ecd41680-a6f5-469e-ad57-c0ba5420469c
Ray, P.S.
f282d884-f048-4d5c-a20d-d7ce53fe1a37
Peacock, J.L.
8362b3b1-458f-4152-936f-344ca1c7e0ba
Simonis, R.B.
4aaa9725-0f2d-4895-a169-75322deb1118
Parnell, E.J.
ecd41680-a6f5-469e-ad57-c0ba5420469c
Ray, P.S.
f282d884-f048-4d5c-a20d-d7ce53fe1a37
Peacock, J.L.
8362b3b1-458f-4152-936f-344ca1c7e0ba

Simonis, R.B., Parnell, E.J., Ray, P.S. and Peacock, J.L. (2003) Electrical treatment of tibial non-union: a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial. Injury, 34 (5), 357-362.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bony non-union has been used in different forms for many years. However, there is still a lot of uncertainty about its efficacy. We, therefore, undertook a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial to try and determine its effect. Over a period of 5 years, 34 consecutive patients with a tibial non-union met our "criteria for inclusion". Each patient had an oblique fibular osteotomy, followed by a unilateral external fixator. They were then randomly allocated one of two machines. Group 1, the active group, received electrical stimulation from an active machine. Group 2, the dummy group, had an identical machine but without any current passing through the active coils. They were then followed up for 6 months and evaluated clinically and radiologically for bony union. Unfortunately, there was by chance, an imbalance in smoking habit between the two groups. The union rate in the subgroup that smoked was 75% (6/8) in the active group as compared to 46% (6/13) in the dummy group. The active group of non-smokers had 100% (10/10) union rate, compared to 67% (2/3) in the dummy group. Overall 24 out of the 34 patients progressed to union. Out of 18, 16 (89%) in the active group showed bony union as compared to 8/16 (50%) in the dummy. There was, thus, a statistically significant positive association between tibial union and electrical stimulation (odds ratio 8, 95% CI: 1.5-41, P=0.02)

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: May 2003
Keywords: trial, osteotomy, efficacy, controlled-trial, radiography, stimulation, methods, odds ratio, smoking, adult, patients, double-blind trial, double-blind, clinical-trial, male, nhs, humans, therapy, adolescent, female, electric stimulation therapy, double-blind method, electromagnetic fields, ununited, hospitals, controlled trial, middle aged, tibial fractures, prospective studies, treatment outcome, fractures, treatment

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62120
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62120
ISSN: 0020-1383
PURE UUID: 2ba576ae-734c-4d53-8ea5-d16584fb026f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Sep 2008
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 01:13

Export record

Contributors

Author: R.B. Simonis
Author: E.J. Parnell
Author: P.S. Ray
Author: J.L. Peacock

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×