The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'

God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'
This article examines the arguments used by Robert Watts, a contemporary of John Stuart Mill, in his criticism of Mill's Utilitarianism. The pamphlet in which Watts expresses his views is a scarce and neglected work. Pioneering studies by J.C. Rees and J.B. Schneewind emphasize the importance of Mill's early critics for historians of nineteenth-century ethics and politial thought. Rees, however, confines his study to the responses to Mill's On Liberty. Schneewind's work is more comprehensive and does mention Watts, but without examining in detail the actual arguments that Watts uses. Further, while Watts criticizes Mill's ethical views from a theological standpoint the arguments he uses are philosophical in character. Watts should not be thought of as a major philosophical critic of Mill, but his relative neglect leaves a gap in the study of the reception of Mill's thought which this article is intended to fill
responses, time
0143-781X
487-504
Johnson, P.
86ce548e-709a-4965-860f-05562216006e
Johnson, P.
86ce548e-709a-4965-860f-05562216006e

Johnson, P. (2006) God in the marketplace: A reconsideration of Robert Watts as an early critic of J.S. Mill's 'Utilitarianism'. History of Political Thought, 27 (3), 487-504.

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article examines the arguments used by Robert Watts, a contemporary of John Stuart Mill, in his criticism of Mill's Utilitarianism. The pamphlet in which Watts expresses his views is a scarce and neglected work. Pioneering studies by J.C. Rees and J.B. Schneewind emphasize the importance of Mill's early critics for historians of nineteenth-century ethics and politial thought. Rees, however, confines his study to the responses to Mill's On Liberty. Schneewind's work is more comprehensive and does mention Watts, but without examining in detail the actual arguments that Watts uses. Further, while Watts criticizes Mill's ethical views from a theological standpoint the arguments he uses are philosophical in character. Watts should not be thought of as a major philosophical critic of Mill, but his relative neglect leaves a gap in the study of the reception of Mill's thought which this article is intended to fill

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2006
Keywords: responses, time

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62805
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62805
ISSN: 0143-781X
PURE UUID: 1ba38f0a-e9d3-47d5-80ee-6fb1bbad7d64

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2008
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 19:06

Export record

Contributors

Author: P. Johnson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×