The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms - a meta-analysis

Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms - a meta-analysis
Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms - a meta-analysis
Background. Laparoscopic surgery for hepatic neoplasms aims to provide curative resection while minimizing complications. The present study compared. laparoscopic versus open surgery for Patients with hepatic neoplasms with regard to short-term outcomes. Methods. Comparative studies published between 1998 and 2005 were included. Evaluated endpoints were operative, functional, and adverse events. A random-effects model was used and sensitivity analysis performed to account for bias in patient selection. Results. Eight nonrandomized studies were included, reporting on 409 resections of hepatic neoplasms, of which 165 (40.3%) were laparoscopic and 244 (59.7%) were open. Operative blood loss (weighted mean difference = -123 mL; confidence interval = -179, -67 mL) and duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference = -2.6 days; confidence interval -3.8, -1.4 days) were significantly reduced after laparoscopic surgery. These findings remained consistent when considering studies matched for the presence of malignancy and segment resection. There was no difference in postoperative adverse events and extent of oncologic clearance. Conclusions. Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance comparable with open surgery. When performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients it may be a safe and feasible option. Because of the potential of significant bias arising from the included studies, further randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to confirm this bias and to assess long-term, survival rates
pneumoperitoneum, surgery, outcomes, initial-experience, partial-hepatectomy, hepatocellular-carcinoma, cirrhotic-patients, colorectal metastases, surgical resection, liver resection, disease
0039-6060
203-211
Simillis, Constantinos
24bf5971-26b0-46fa-9bad-7e35090740fe
Constantinides, Vasilis A.
5caff308-52c3-4e4d-8fab-e99133ee8ba6
Tekkis, Paris P.
c042bcd5-7b60-4cc0-8881-5015eb430560
Darzi, Ara
5a4bc779-f6b1-44c8-ae23-eb289b59ad27
Lovegrove, Richard
58fe6306-0a98-4d1f-818f-da80467f4678
Jiao, Long
d054f167-1837-437c-a930-efeee09e9fd8
Antoniou, Anthony
538efe60-8406-4414-ba43-9946d50f74c8
Simillis, Constantinos
24bf5971-26b0-46fa-9bad-7e35090740fe
Constantinides, Vasilis A.
5caff308-52c3-4e4d-8fab-e99133ee8ba6
Tekkis, Paris P.
c042bcd5-7b60-4cc0-8881-5015eb430560
Darzi, Ara
5a4bc779-f6b1-44c8-ae23-eb289b59ad27
Lovegrove, Richard
58fe6306-0a98-4d1f-818f-da80467f4678
Jiao, Long
d054f167-1837-437c-a930-efeee09e9fd8
Antoniou, Anthony
538efe60-8406-4414-ba43-9946d50f74c8

Simillis, Constantinos, Constantinides, Vasilis A., Tekkis, Paris P., Darzi, Ara, Lovegrove, Richard, Jiao, Long and Antoniou, Anthony (2007) Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and malignant neoplasms - a meta-analysis. Surgery, 141 (2), 203-211. (doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.035).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background. Laparoscopic surgery for hepatic neoplasms aims to provide curative resection while minimizing complications. The present study compared. laparoscopic versus open surgery for Patients with hepatic neoplasms with regard to short-term outcomes. Methods. Comparative studies published between 1998 and 2005 were included. Evaluated endpoints were operative, functional, and adverse events. A random-effects model was used and sensitivity analysis performed to account for bias in patient selection. Results. Eight nonrandomized studies were included, reporting on 409 resections of hepatic neoplasms, of which 165 (40.3%) were laparoscopic and 244 (59.7%) were open. Operative blood loss (weighted mean difference = -123 mL; confidence interval = -179, -67 mL) and duration of hospital stay (weighted mean difference = -2.6 days; confidence interval -3.8, -1.4 days) were significantly reduced after laparoscopic surgery. These findings remained consistent when considering studies matched for the presence of malignancy and segment resection. There was no difference in postoperative adverse events and extent of oncologic clearance. Conclusions. Laparoscopic resection results in reduced operative blood loss and earlier recovery with oncologic clearance comparable with open surgery. When performed by experienced surgeons in selected patients it may be a safe and feasible option. Because of the potential of significant bias arising from the included studies, further randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to confirm this bias and to assess long-term, survival rates

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: February 2007
Keywords: pneumoperitoneum, surgery, outcomes, initial-experience, partial-hepatectomy, hepatocellular-carcinoma, cirrhotic-patients, colorectal metastases, surgical resection, liver resection, disease

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 62926
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/62926
ISSN: 0039-6060
PURE UUID: 26ebc674-0769-4754-a8f7-eede1f481a2e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Sep 2008
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 11:33

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Constantinos Simillis
Author: Vasilis A. Constantinides
Author: Paris P. Tekkis
Author: Ara Darzi
Author: Richard Lovegrove
Author: Long Jiao
Author: Anthony Antoniou

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×