The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Flavour preferences in concentrate diets for stabled horses

Flavour preferences in concentrate diets for stabled horses
Flavour preferences in concentrate diets for stabled horses
Our previous trials investigating effects of diet flavour in stabled horses indicated significant effects on foraging behaviour and selection. In this series of three trials we aimed to determine relative acceptance by presenting flavour preference tests to eight horses. Horses were stabled and fed hay ad lib on trial data collection days plus a standard unflavoured concentrate ration at 7.30am. In Trial I 15 flavours were separately presented at 1% in standard 100g cereal by-product meals. Quantity consumed, time to completion, partial rejection or refusal were recorded. Order of presentation determined by Latin Square design. Trial data was collected on fi ve sampling days, separated by a minimum of one day. Horses were presented with six flavoured meals daily, minimum one hour between meals. Each flavour presented in two replicates. The most preferred 8 flavours (grams consumed and time to completion) from Trial I (Cherry, Oregano, Peppermint, Cumin, Rosemary, Fenugreek, Banana and Carrot) were presented in paired preference tests in Trial II. In Trial II all combinations of the eight flavours were presented, in two tests per day at noon and 4pm. Presentations of the same fl avour separated by at least one day. Paired presentations were of 3g in 300g cereal by-product. Presentations terminated when approx half of the total amount presented had been consumed. Flavour preferences expressed as a gram ratio from 0 (rejection) to 1 (exclusive consumption). One sample T-tests for paired fl avour preferences indicated an order based on significance levels (t=2.3 – 7.3 P<0.05 – P<0.001) of Fenugreek>Banana>Rosemary>Carrot>Cherry>Cumin>Peppermint>Oregano. In Trial III relative consumption times of 100g mineral pellets flavoured with Fenugreek or Banana were significantly reduced in comparison with unflavoured pellets over 5 days (Wilcoxon signed ranks test: Fenugreek Z=-1.99 -2.2, P<0.05, Banana Z=-2.2, P<0.05). In these short term trials, flavour had significant effects on diet acceptance and consumption times.
p.80
ISAE 2004
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Davidson, H.P.B.
c94e24c3-37c7-4410-9961-03125268908c
Harris, P.
65908d3a-d64f-436d-829a-fd500923515b
Hänninen, Laura
Valros, Anna
Goodwin, D.
44ea5b5f-3933-4171-83b6-8d48928e27ca
Davidson, H.P.B.
c94e24c3-37c7-4410-9961-03125268908c
Harris, P.
65908d3a-d64f-436d-829a-fd500923515b
Hänninen, Laura
Valros, Anna

Goodwin, D., Davidson, H.P.B. and Harris, P. (2004) Flavour preferences in concentrate diets for stabled horses. Hänninen, Laura and Valros, Anna (eds.) In Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE. ISAE 2004. p.80 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Our previous trials investigating effects of diet flavour in stabled horses indicated significant effects on foraging behaviour and selection. In this series of three trials we aimed to determine relative acceptance by presenting flavour preference tests to eight horses. Horses were stabled and fed hay ad lib on trial data collection days plus a standard unflavoured concentrate ration at 7.30am. In Trial I 15 flavours were separately presented at 1% in standard 100g cereal by-product meals. Quantity consumed, time to completion, partial rejection or refusal were recorded. Order of presentation determined by Latin Square design. Trial data was collected on fi ve sampling days, separated by a minimum of one day. Horses were presented with six flavoured meals daily, minimum one hour between meals. Each flavour presented in two replicates. The most preferred 8 flavours (grams consumed and time to completion) from Trial I (Cherry, Oregano, Peppermint, Cumin, Rosemary, Fenugreek, Banana and Carrot) were presented in paired preference tests in Trial II. In Trial II all combinations of the eight flavours were presented, in two tests per day at noon and 4pm. Presentations of the same fl avour separated by at least one day. Paired presentations were of 3g in 300g cereal by-product. Presentations terminated when approx half of the total amount presented had been consumed. Flavour preferences expressed as a gram ratio from 0 (rejection) to 1 (exclusive consumption). One sample T-tests for paired fl avour preferences indicated an order based on significance levels (t=2.3 – 7.3 P<0.05 – P<0.001) of Fenugreek>Banana>Rosemary>Carrot>Cherry>Cumin>Peppermint>Oregano. In Trial III relative consumption times of 100g mineral pellets flavoured with Fenugreek or Banana were significantly reduced in comparison with unflavoured pellets over 5 days (Wilcoxon signed ranks test: Fenugreek Z=-1.99 -2.2, P<0.05, Banana Z=-2.2, P<0.05). In these short term trials, flavour had significant effects on diet acceptance and consumption times.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 5 August 2004
Venue - Dates: conference; 2004-08-03; 2004-08-07, Helsinki, Finland, 2004-08-02 - 2004-08-06

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63504
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63504
PURE UUID: acdb5970-8d08-43bf-a099-9e1487f2e8a5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Oct 2008
Last modified: 11 Dec 2021 18:15

Export record

Contributors

Author: D. Goodwin
Author: H.P.B. Davidson
Author: P. Harris
Editor: Laura Hänninen
Editor: Anna Valros

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×