The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Promoting natural foraging behaviour in stabled horses

Promoting natural foraging behaviour in stabled horses
Promoting natural foraging behaviour in stabled horses
Four preliminary trials investigated foraging behaviour in stabled horses provided with multiple forages (in press Equine Veterinary Journal). These trials suggested that stabled horses were using foraging behaviour strategies previously recorded in freeranging and feral horses, and other large grazing herbivores. Patch grazing strategies allow herbivores to select a better than average diet from a heterogeneous resource. The preliminary trials also compared the behaviour of horses in a single stable with an otherwise identical stable containing six forages. Horses exhibited less searching behaviour and less stereotypical behaviour in the multiple forage environment than the same horses in an identical stable containing a single forage. In the four replicated choice trials reported here, up to 12 competition horses were allowed 5 minutes access to two otherwise identical stables containing single or multiple forages. Horses were subsequently allowed to choose between the stables during a 5 minute liberty test. In two of the trials the single forage presented was hay and in two the single forage was a previously preferred forage. In Trial 1 and 3 (single forage=hay), the horses showed a strong preference for the multiple forage stable (Chisquared S/S, S/M, M/M: Chi-squared=16.4 (Trial 1) and 22.00 (Trial 3), df=2, p<0.0001). In Trials 2 and 4 (single forage=preferred) the horses also showed a preference, though less significant, for the multiple forage environment (S/S, S/M, M/M (Trial 2) Chi-squared=4.7, df=2, p=0.09 and (Trial 4) Chi-squared=5.6, df=2, p=0.06). The preliminary trials indicated that foraging enrichment prompted exhibition of wildtype foraging behaviour in stabled horses. The four choice trials showed these stabled horses selected an enriched over a restricted forage environment through a locational choice. This provides further evidence to support foraging enrichment of the stable environment to facilitate highly motivated behaviour in a restricted domestic environment.
horse, foraging behaviour, environmental enrichment, domestication, feral
P.40
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
Davidson, Nell
49dad694-d86d-406a-a9b2-11e81e04d38d
Harris, Pat
c5c0081f-0085-49cb-8993-6ae92ccbb6b2
Koene, Paul
Scientific Committee of the 36th ISAE Congress,
Goodwin, Deborah
6a44fe30-189a-493d-8dcc-3eb8199a12ab
Davidson, Nell
49dad694-d86d-406a-a9b2-11e81e04d38d
Harris, Pat
c5c0081f-0085-49cb-8993-6ae92ccbb6b2
Koene, Paul
Scientific Committee of the 36th ISAE Congress,

Goodwin, Deborah, Davidson, Nell and Harris, Pat (2002) Promoting natural foraging behaviour in stabled horses. Koene, Paul and Scientific Committee of the 36th ISAE Congress, (eds.) In Proceedings of the 36th Internaltional Congress of the ISAE. P.40 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Four preliminary trials investigated foraging behaviour in stabled horses provided with multiple forages (in press Equine Veterinary Journal). These trials suggested that stabled horses were using foraging behaviour strategies previously recorded in freeranging and feral horses, and other large grazing herbivores. Patch grazing strategies allow herbivores to select a better than average diet from a heterogeneous resource. The preliminary trials also compared the behaviour of horses in a single stable with an otherwise identical stable containing six forages. Horses exhibited less searching behaviour and less stereotypical behaviour in the multiple forage environment than the same horses in an identical stable containing a single forage. In the four replicated choice trials reported here, up to 12 competition horses were allowed 5 minutes access to two otherwise identical stables containing single or multiple forages. Horses were subsequently allowed to choose between the stables during a 5 minute liberty test. In two of the trials the single forage presented was hay and in two the single forage was a previously preferred forage. In Trial 1 and 3 (single forage=hay), the horses showed a strong preference for the multiple forage stable (Chisquared S/S, S/M, M/M: Chi-squared=16.4 (Trial 1) and 22.00 (Trial 3), df=2, p<0.0001). In Trials 2 and 4 (single forage=preferred) the horses also showed a preference, though less significant, for the multiple forage environment (S/S, S/M, M/M (Trial 2) Chi-squared=4.7, df=2, p=0.09 and (Trial 4) Chi-squared=5.6, df=2, p=0.06). The preliminary trials indicated that foraging enrichment prompted exhibition of wildtype foraging behaviour in stabled horses. The four choice trials showed these stabled horses selected an enriched over a restricted forage environment through a locational choice. This provides further evidence to support foraging enrichment of the stable environment to facilitate highly motivated behaviour in a restricted domestic environment.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 7 August 2002
Venue - Dates: conference; 2002-08-06; 2002-08-10, Egmond aan Zee, The Netherlands, 2002-08-06 - 2002-08-10
Keywords: horse, foraging behaviour, environmental enrichment, domestication, feral

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 63505
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/63505
PURE UUID: 6d32feea-59be-4564-bdf1-99a9a1573f54

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 14 Oct 2008
Last modified: 11 Apr 2024 16:40

Export record

Contributors

Author: Deborah Goodwin
Author: Nell Davidson
Author: Pat Harris
Editor: Paul Koene
Editor: Scientific Committee of the 36th ISAE Congress

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×