The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) process and outcome: a systematic evaluation of ACT for treatment resistant patients

Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) process and outcome: a systematic evaluation of ACT for treatment resistant patients
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) process and outcome: a systematic evaluation of ACT for treatment resistant patients
Although traditional Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) has achieved many clinical successes, approximately 30-50% of patients are resistant to this form of treatment. This trans-diagnostic group of treatment resistant patients typically have chronic, co-morbid, and/or personality disordered symptoms and often engage in a range of maladaptive behaviours (e.g., substance abuse, deliberate self-harm). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a relatively modern psychological treatment which proposes that the formally dissimilar symptoms this group present result from a common cause; namely, excessive entanglement with, and a need to escape from or avoid, unwanted private events such as thoughts, feelings, and memories (experiential avoidance). Preliminary evidence from clinical trials suggest that ACT may prove efficacious with treatment resistant patients. In this thesis, four studies were designed to examine the theoretical underpinnings and clinical utility of ACT. Studies 1 and 2 tested the ACT-derived prediction that diverse maladaptive behaviours serve a common experiential avoidance function. In support of this hypothesis, structural equation modelling showed that experiential avoidance predicted significant maladaptive behaviour covariance. Moreover, using the same method, a cross-sectional design showed that experiential avoidance partially mediated the effect of Negative Affect Intensity and Childhood Trauma on the tendency to engage in maladaptive behaviours. Studies 3 and 4 extended these theoretically-based investigations into the applied domain, pilot testing ACT for a sample of patients whose symptoms had been resistant to, or relapsed following, standard care. Study 3, a pre-post uncontrolled trial, revealed significant reductions in psychological distress with gains maintained at 6 and 12-month follow-up. Study 4, a randomised control trial comparing ACT to a CBT treatment as usual (CBT-TAU) condition, showed that ACT achieved more enduring effects than CBT-TAU. Furthermore, exploratory analyses suggested that, for the ACT group alone, reductions in experiential avoidance during treatment predicted follow-up outcomes. These findings support the use of ACT for treatment resistant patients.
Kingston, Jessica
1960cdaf-ce2b-4f00-9dd8-24b1af5d1daa
Kingston, Jessica
1960cdaf-ce2b-4f00-9dd8-24b1af5d1daa
Remington, Robert
87f75b79-4207-4b3a-8ad0-a8e4b26c010f
Clarke, Susan
48c5c3aa-db3f-4264-9ecc-0f4501597cf8

Kingston, Jessica (2008) Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) process and outcome: a systematic evaluation of ACT for treatment resistant patients. University of Southampton, School of Psychology, Doctoral Thesis, 304pp.

Record type: Thesis (Doctoral)

Abstract

Although traditional Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) has achieved many clinical successes, approximately 30-50% of patients are resistant to this form of treatment. This trans-diagnostic group of treatment resistant patients typically have chronic, co-morbid, and/or personality disordered symptoms and often engage in a range of maladaptive behaviours (e.g., substance abuse, deliberate self-harm). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a relatively modern psychological treatment which proposes that the formally dissimilar symptoms this group present result from a common cause; namely, excessive entanglement with, and a need to escape from or avoid, unwanted private events such as thoughts, feelings, and memories (experiential avoidance). Preliminary evidence from clinical trials suggest that ACT may prove efficacious with treatment resistant patients. In this thesis, four studies were designed to examine the theoretical underpinnings and clinical utility of ACT. Studies 1 and 2 tested the ACT-derived prediction that diverse maladaptive behaviours serve a common experiential avoidance function. In support of this hypothesis, structural equation modelling showed that experiential avoidance predicted significant maladaptive behaviour covariance. Moreover, using the same method, a cross-sectional design showed that experiential avoidance partially mediated the effect of Negative Affect Intensity and Childhood Trauma on the tendency to engage in maladaptive behaviours. Studies 3 and 4 extended these theoretically-based investigations into the applied domain, pilot testing ACT for a sample of patients whose symptoms had been resistant to, or relapsed following, standard care. Study 3, a pre-post uncontrolled trial, revealed significant reductions in psychological distress with gains maintained at 6 and 12-month follow-up. Study 4, a randomised control trial comparing ACT to a CBT treatment as usual (CBT-TAU) condition, showed that ACT achieved more enduring effects than CBT-TAU. Furthermore, exploratory analyses suggested that, for the ACT group alone, reductions in experiential avoidance during treatment predicted follow-up outcomes. These findings support the use of ACT for treatment resistant patients.

Text
Jesica_Kingston_2009_Thesis.pdf - Other
Download (2MB)

More information

Published date: November 2008
Organisations: University of Southampton

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 66160
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/66160
PURE UUID: 60d2481c-952f-4709-add4-ac89319ad130

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 May 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 18:10

Export record

Contributors

Author: Jessica Kingston
Thesis advisor: Robert Remington
Thesis advisor: Susan Clarke

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×