Challenging medicine: the case of podiatric surgery
Challenging medicine: the case of podiatric surgery
This paper examines the establishment of National Health Service (NHS) podiatric surgery as a challenge to the dominance of medicine and its control over the provision of foot surgical services. The practice of surgery by non-medically qualified podiatrists and its integration within mainstream NHS service provision is evaluated as possible evidence of the diminishing authority of medicine in determining the scope and boundaries of paramedical practice and in successfully resisting encroachment from other ‘health professions’. The centrality of medical power in the organisation of healthcare has characterised much of the existing sociological literature on the health professions, most evident within the professional dominance perspective (Freidson 1970a, 1970b). This approach, and its variants, particularly highlight the autonomous control of medicine over its knowledge base, clients and clinical activities, in addition to its hegemonic position in relation a range of subordinate healthcare occupations (Freidson 1970a, 1970b; Johnson 1972; Larkin 1983, 1988, 1993, 1995; Wolinsky 1993).
369-383
Borthwick, Alan M.
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
2000
Borthwick, Alan M.
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
Borthwick, Alan M.
(2000)
Challenging medicine: the case of podiatric surgery.
Work, Employment and Society, 14 (2), .
(doi:10.1017/S0950017000000209).
Abstract
This paper examines the establishment of National Health Service (NHS) podiatric surgery as a challenge to the dominance of medicine and its control over the provision of foot surgical services. The practice of surgery by non-medically qualified podiatrists and its integration within mainstream NHS service provision is evaluated as possible evidence of the diminishing authority of medicine in determining the scope and boundaries of paramedical practice and in successfully resisting encroachment from other ‘health professions’. The centrality of medical power in the organisation of healthcare has characterised much of the existing sociological literature on the health professions, most evident within the professional dominance perspective (Freidson 1970a, 1970b). This approach, and its variants, particularly highlight the autonomous control of medicine over its knowledge base, clients and clinical activities, in addition to its hegemonic position in relation a range of subordinate healthcare occupations (Freidson 1970a, 1970b; Johnson 1972; Larkin 1983, 1988, 1993, 1995; Wolinsky 1993).
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2000
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 67065
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/67065
PURE UUID: 92b2cdc8-7ae8-4dc6-8ff1-6bc29717a6bc
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Aug 2009
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 18:45
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Alan M. Borthwick
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics