Lewis, H.G., Newland, R.J., Swinerd, G.G. and Saunders, A. (2008) A new analysis of debris mitigation and removal using networks. In, 59th International Astronautical Congress, Glasgow, Scotland, 29 Sep - 03 Oct 2008. , 13pp.
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/68974/

Full text of this item is not available from this server.

Abstract

Modelling studies have shown that the implementation of mitigation guidelines, which aim to reduce the amount of new debris generated on-orbit, is an important requirement of future space activities but may be insufficient to stabilise the near-Earth debris environment. The role of a variety of mitigation practices in stabilising the environment has been investigated over the last decade, as has the potential of active debris removal (ADR) methods in recent work. We present a theoretical approach to the analysis of the debris environment that is based on the study of networks, composed of vertices and edges, which describe the dynamic relationships between Earth satellites in the debris system. Future projections of the 10 cm and larger satellite population in a non-mitigation scenario, conducted with the DAMAGE model, are used to reconstruct a network in which vertices represent satellites and edges encapsulate conjunctions between collision pairs. The network structure is then quantified using statistical measures, providing a numerical baseline for this future projection scenario. Finally, the impact of mitigation strategies and active debris removal, which can be mapped onto the network by altering or removing edges and vertices, can be assessed in terms of the changes from this baseline. The paper introduces the network methodology, highlights the ways in which this approach can be used to formalise criteria for debris mitigation and removal. It then summarises changes to the adopted network that correspond to an increasing stability and changes that represent a decreasing stability of the future debris environment.

Edit this item (Staff only)

References in Article

1. Liou, J.-C., and Johnson, N.L., 2006, Risks in space from orbiting debris. Science, Vol. 311, 340 – 341.
2. Lewis, H.G., Swinerd, G.G., Newland, R.J., and Saunders, A., 2008, The Fast Debris Evolution Model. 37th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, July 2008, Montreal, Canada.
3. Liou, J.-C., and Johnson, N.L., 2007, A sensitivity study of the effectiveness of active debris removal in LEO. 58th International Astronautical Congress, Hyderabad, India, Article IAC-07-A6.3.05.
4. Bar-Yam, Y., 1997, Dynamics of Complex Systems. Perseus Books, CO.
5. Agre, P., 2003, Hierarchy and history in Simon’s “Architecture of complexity”, Journal of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 3, 413-426.
6. Bak, P., Tang, C., and Wiesenfeld, K., 1987, Self-organized criticality: An exploration of the 1/f noise, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 59, 381-384
7. Simon, H., The Architecture of Complexity”, The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Newman, M.E.J., 2003a, The mathematics of networks. In L. Durlauf and S. Blume (Eds.), The New Palgrave Encyclopedia of Economics, 45, Palgrave Macmillan, UK, 167-256.
9. Barabasi, A.-L., and Bonabeau, E., 2003, Scale-free networks. Scientific American, Vol. 288, No. 5, 50-59.
10. Strogatz, S., 2001, Exploring complex networks. Nature, Vol. 410, 268-276.
11. Newman, M.E.J., 2003b, The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, Vol. 45, No. 2, 167-256.
12. Watts, D.J., and Strogatz, S., 1998, Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, Vol. 393, 440-442.
13. Ahuja, R.K., Magnanti, T.L., and Orlin, J.B., 1993, Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Prentice Hall, NJ.
14. Johnson, N.L., Krisko, P.H., Liou, J.-C., and Anz-Meador, P.D., 2001, NASA'S new breakup model of EVOLVE 4.0. Adv. Space Res. Vol. 28, No. 9, 1377–1384.
15. Liou, J.-C., 2006, Collision activities in the future orbital debris environment. Advances in Space Research, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2102-2106.
16. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N.S., Wang, J.T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B, and Ideker, T., 2003, Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Research, Vol. 13, 2498-2504.
17. Newman, M.E.J., and Girvan, M., 2004, Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review, Vol 69, Article 026113.
18. Holme, P., Kim, B.J., Yoon, C.N., and Han, S.K., 2002, Attack vulnerability of complex networks. Physical Review E, Vol. 65, Article 056109.