'Tough'-constructions and their derivation


Hicks, Glyn (2009) 'Tough'-constructions and their derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, (4), 535-566. (doi:10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.535).

This is the latest version of this item.

Download

[img] PDF
Download (219Kb)

Description/Abstract

This article addresses the syntax of the notorious 'tough' (-movement) construction (TC) in English. TCs exhibit a range of apparently contradictory empirical properties suggesting that their derivation involves the application of both A-movement and A'-movement operations. Given that within previous
Principles and Parameters models TCs have remained “unexplained and in principle unexplainable” (Holmberg 2000: 839) due to incompatibility with constraints on theta-assignment, locality, and Case, this article argues that the phase-based implementation of the Minimalist program (Chomsky 2000,
2001, 2004) permits a reanalysis of null wh-operators capable of circumventing the previous theoretical difficulties. Essentially, 'tough'-movement consists of A-moving a constituent out of a “complex” null operator which has already undergone A'-movement, a “smuggling” construction in the terms of Collins (2005a,b)

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 0024-3892 (print)
Related URLs:
Keywords: tough-movement, null operators, a-bar movement, raising, phases
Subjects: P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics
Divisions: University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Humanities > Modern Languages
ePrint ID: 69052
Date Deposited: 20 Oct 2009
Last Modified: 27 Mar 2014 18:48
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69052

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics