The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

'Tough'-constructions and their derivation

'Tough'-constructions and their derivation
'Tough'-constructions and their derivation
This article addresses the syntax of the notorious 'tough' (-movement) construction (TC) in English. TCs exhibit a range of apparently contradictory empirical properties suggesting that their derivation involves the application of both A-movement and A'-movement operations. Given that within previous Principles and Parameters models TCs have remained “unexplained and in principle unexplainable” (Holmberg 2000: 839) due to incompatibility with constraints on theta-assignment, locality, and Case, this article argues that the phase-based implementation of the Minimalist program (Chomsky 2000, 2001, 2004) permits a reanalysis of null wh-operators capable of circumventing the previous theoretical difficulties. Essentially, 'tough'-movement consists of A-moving a constituent out of a “complex” null operator which has already undergone A'-movement, a “smuggling” construction in the terms of Collins (2005a,b)
tough-movement, null operators, a-bar movement, raising, phases
0024-3892
535-566
Hicks, Glyn
1f3753b1-1224-4cd3-8af3-5bf708062831
Hicks, Glyn
1f3753b1-1224-4cd3-8af3-5bf708062831

Hicks, Glyn (2009) 'Tough'-constructions and their derivation. Linguistic Inquiry, 40 (4), 535-566. (doi:10.1162/ling.2009.40.4.535).

Record type: Article

Abstract

This article addresses the syntax of the notorious 'tough' (-movement) construction (TC) in English. TCs exhibit a range of apparently contradictory empirical properties suggesting that their derivation involves the application of both A-movement and A'-movement operations. Given that within previous Principles and Parameters models TCs have remained “unexplained and in principle unexplainable” (Holmberg 2000: 839) due to incompatibility with constraints on theta-assignment, locality, and Case, this article argues that the phase-based implementation of the Minimalist program (Chomsky 2000, 2001, 2004) permits a reanalysis of null wh-operators capable of circumventing the previous theoretical difficulties. Essentially, 'tough'-movement consists of A-moving a constituent out of a “complex” null operator which has already undergone A'-movement, a “smuggling” construction in the terms of Collins (2005a,b)

Text
64785.pdf - Other
Download (224kB)

More information

Published date: 14 October 2009
Keywords: tough-movement, null operators, a-bar movement, raising, phases
Organisations: Modern Languages

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69052
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69052
ISSN: 0024-3892
PURE UUID: 142c5f47-a274-40d2-b522-5f97f68a912a
ORCID for Glyn Hicks: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-8655

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Oct 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:53

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×