The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Climate change mitigation: trade-offs between delay and strength of action required

Climate change mitigation: trade-offs between delay and strength of action required
Climate change mitigation: trade-offs between delay and strength of action required
Climate change mitigation via a reduction in the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) is the principle requirement for reducing global warming, its impacts, and the degree of adaptation required. We present a simple conceptual model of anthropogenic CO2 emissions to highlight the trade off between delay in commencing mitigation, and the strength of mitigation then required to meet specific atmospheric CO2 stabilization targets. We calculate the effects of alternative emission profiles on atmospheric CO2 and global temperature change over a millennial timescale using a simple coupled carbon cycle-climate model. For example, if it takes 50 years to transform the energy sector and the maximum rate at which emissions can be reduced is ?2.5% , delaying action until 2020 would lead to stabilization at 540 ppm. A further 20 year delay would result in a stabilization level of 730 ppm, and a delay until 2060 would mean stabilising at over 1,000 ppm. If stabilization targets are met through delayed action, combined with strong rates of mitigation, the emissions profiles result in transient peaks of atmospheric CO2 (and potentially temperature) that exceed the stabilization targets. Stabilization at 450 ppm requires maximum mitigation rates of ?3% to ?5% , and when delay exceeds 2020, transient peaks in excess of 550 ppm occur. Consequently tipping points for certain Earth system components may be transgressed. Avoiding dangerous climate change is more easily achievable if global mitigation action commences as soon as possible. Starting mitigation earlier is also more effective than acting more aggressively once mitigation has begun.
0165-0009
29-43
Vaughan, Naomi E.
baeea626-1a75-4a7b-b675-3f124e306de1
Lenton, Timothy M.
245a93ab-92e4-4719-a8b7-7ef66d65d048
Shepherd, John G.
f38de3ac-eb3b-403f-8767-c76be68d8bf2
Vaughan, Naomi E.
baeea626-1a75-4a7b-b675-3f124e306de1
Lenton, Timothy M.
245a93ab-92e4-4719-a8b7-7ef66d65d048
Shepherd, John G.
f38de3ac-eb3b-403f-8767-c76be68d8bf2

Vaughan, Naomi E., Lenton, Timothy M. and Shepherd, John G. (2009) Climate change mitigation: trade-offs between delay and strength of action required. Climatic Change, 96 (1-2), 29-43. (doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9573-7).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Climate change mitigation via a reduction in the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) is the principle requirement for reducing global warming, its impacts, and the degree of adaptation required. We present a simple conceptual model of anthropogenic CO2 emissions to highlight the trade off between delay in commencing mitigation, and the strength of mitigation then required to meet specific atmospheric CO2 stabilization targets. We calculate the effects of alternative emission profiles on atmospheric CO2 and global temperature change over a millennial timescale using a simple coupled carbon cycle-climate model. For example, if it takes 50 years to transform the energy sector and the maximum rate at which emissions can be reduced is ?2.5% , delaying action until 2020 would lead to stabilization at 540 ppm. A further 20 year delay would result in a stabilization level of 730 ppm, and a delay until 2060 would mean stabilising at over 1,000 ppm. If stabilization targets are met through delayed action, combined with strong rates of mitigation, the emissions profiles result in transient peaks of atmospheric CO2 (and potentially temperature) that exceed the stabilization targets. Stabilization at 450 ppm requires maximum mitigation rates of ?3% to ?5% , and when delay exceeds 2020, transient peaks in excess of 550 ppm occur. Consequently tipping points for certain Earth system components may be transgressed. Avoiding dangerous climate change is more easily achievable if global mitigation action commences as soon as possible. Starting mitigation earlier is also more effective than acting more aggressively once mitigation has begun.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2009
Organisations: Ocean and Earth Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 69197
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/69197
ISSN: 0165-0009
PURE UUID: d512c2a1-7883-4116-bde0-c6c4c46f9365
ORCID for John G. Shepherd: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5230-4781

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Oct 2009
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 02:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Naomi E. Vaughan
Author: Timothy M. Lenton

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×