A comparison of the test-re-test reliability of four tools used to measure grip strength in a healthy population
Ward, Caroline and Adams, Jo (2007) A comparison of the test-re-test reliability of four tools used to measure grip strength in a healthy population. Hand Therapy, 12, (2), 114-118.
Full text not available from this repository.
Outcome measures need to have an acceptable level of reliability for sound use in clinical and research practice. This study compared the test-re-test reliability of four hand dynamometers measuring grip strength. Using a counterbalanced, repeated measures design, 30 healthy individuals performed three consecutive grip measurements on the MIE digital grip analyser, Baseline Bulb, Jamar® and Lafayette hand dynamometers in a random order on two separate days at the same time. Results indicated that all tools showed a similar and acceptable level of reliability, with a minimum of 90% of the repeat grip data falling within 95% of agreed levels of agreement. The dominant hand showed less variation in grip strength than the non-dominant. Hand pressure was seen to be no less reliable than hand force in a healthy population. Clinicians and researchers can be reassured that the test-re-test reliability of four commonly available dynamometers is acceptable for clinical and research work
|Subjects:||R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine|
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Health Sciences
|Date Deposited:||10 Dec 2009|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2012 13:35|
|Contributors:||Ward, Caroline (Author)
Adams, Jo (Author)
|Contact Email Address:||email@example.com|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)