Grace, Marcus (2009) Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting. International Journal of Science Education, 31, (4), 551-570. (doi:10.1080/09500690701744595)
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/71911/

This is the latest version of this eprint.

Full text available as:

	Microsoft Word (Article. 15pp) 125 Kb
	Microsoft Word (Figure 1. 3pp) 39 Kb
	Microsoft Word (Tables. 3pp) 59 Kb

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0950...0701744595

Abstract

The conservation of biodiversity is an important socio-scientific issue, often regarded as a precondition to sustainable development, and the foundation for citizens’ understanding of conservation issues can be laid down in formal school education. This research focuses on decision-making discussions about biological conservation issues among 131 15-16 year old students, to address two main research questions: 1. Can peer-group decision-making discussions, in a normal science lesson setting, help develop students’ personal reasoning in relation to conservation issues? 2. Are there features common to high-quality discussions about conservation which might be readily identified by classroom teachers? Findings indicate the positive value of students taking part in these short decision-making discussions, guided by a structured framework, as part of their normal science classroom activities. Students increase their quality of personal reasoning, and modify their solutions to the issues. The study begins to uncover features about students, as individuals and as members of discussion groups, which can be associated with high quality decision-making about conservation issues, and which teachers might realistically identify. The work calls for the need to cultivate these features, and integrate them appropriately with learning about the scientific concepts that underpin the theory and practice of conservation management. Such integration will facilitate the development of teaching strategies for dealing effectively with the complex topic of biological conservation; not just in terms of science content, but also in terms of how students are expected to engage with the issues.

Available Versions of this Item

• Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting (deposited 12 January 2010) [Currently Displayed]

Edit this item (Staff only)

References in Article

AIKENHEAD, G.S. (1985) Collective decision-making in the social context of science. Science Education. 69 (4), 453-475
AIKENHEAD, G.S. (1989) Decision-making theories as tools for interpreting student behaviour during a scientific enquiry simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 26, 3, 189-203
AIKENHEAD, G.S. (1991) Logical Reasoning in Science and Technology (LoRST). Toronto: John Wiley of Canada.
ALEXOPOULOU, E. and DRIVER, R. (1996) Small-group discussion in physics: peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114
BARON, J. and BROWN, R.V. (1991) Teaching Decision-making to Adolescents. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
BOZA, M.A. (1993) Conservation in action: past, present and future of the national
parks system in Costa Rica. Conservation Biology, 7, 239-247.
COHEN, E. G. (1994) Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research. 64, 1-35
DE JAGER, H. and VAN DER LOO, F. (1990) Decision-making in environmental education: Notes from research in the Dutch NME-VO Project. Journal of Environmental Education, 22, (1) 33-42
DRIVER, R., NEWTON, P. and OSBORNE, J. (2000) Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education. 84 (3), 287-312
DUSCHL, R. A. and OSBORNE, J. (2002) Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72
GAYFORD, C. (1992) Patterns of group behaviour in open-ended problem-solving in science classes with 15 year old students in England. International Journal of Science Education. 14 (1), 41-49
GRACE, M. (2005) Adolescent Decision-making about Biological Conservation Issues. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Southampton, UK.
GRACE, M. and SHARP. J.G (2000) Young people’s views on the importance of biodiversity conservation. School Science Review, 81(299), 2000, 49-56
GRACE, M. and RATCLIFFE, M. (2002) The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 2002, 24 (11) 1157-1169
HACKER, R. J. and ROWE, M. J. (1997) The impact of National Curriculum development on teaching and learning behaviours. International Journal of Science Education. 19 (9), 997-1004
HARWOOD, D. (1989) The nature of teacher-pupil interaction in the active tutorial work approach: Using interaction analysis to evaluate student-centred approaches. British Educational Research Journal, 15, 177-194
HIROKAWA. R.Y. and JOHNSON, D.D. (1989) Toward a theory of group decision-making. Small Group Behaviour, 20(4), 500-523
HOGAN, K. (1999) Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (8), 855-882
KORTLAND, K. (1994) Decision-making on science-related social issus: a theoretical/ empirical framework for the development of students’ concepts and decision-making skills. In K. Boersma, K.Kortland, J.van Trommel (eds.) Science and Technology Education in a Demanding Society. Proceedings of the 7th IOSTE Symposium. Enchede, Netherlands: National Iinstitute of Curriculum Development, 471-482
KUHN, D., SHAW, V. and FELTON, M. (1997) Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 3, 287-315.
MERCER, N., WEGERIF, R. and DAWES, L. (1999) Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95-111
MERCER, N., DAWES, L., WEGERIF, R. and SAMS, C. (2004) Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359-377
NAYLOR, S., DOWNING, B. and KEOGH, B. (2001) An empirical study of argumentation in primary science, using concept cartoons as the stimulus. European Science Education Research Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece.
NEWTON, P., DRIVER, R. and OSBORNE, J. (1999) The place of argumentation in pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (5) 553-576
OSBORNE, J., SIMON, S., ERDURAN, S. and MONK, M. (2001) Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. European Science Education Research Conference, Thessaloniki, Greece.
OSBORNE, J. ERDURAN, S. and SIMON, S. (2004a) Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (10), 994-1020
OSBORNE, J. ERDURAN, S. and SIMON, S. (2004b) Ideas, Evidence and Argument in Science: In-service training pack. London: Kings College London
OULTON, C., DAY, V., DILLON, J. and GRACE, M. (2004) Controversial Issues - teachers’ attitudes and practices in the context of citizenship education. Oxford Review of Education, 30 (4), 489-508
QUALIFICATIONS AND CURRICULUM AUTHORITY (QCA) (2004) Science National Curriculum for England. London, QCA
RATCLIFFE, M. (1996) Adolescent decision-making about socio-scientific issues, within the science curriculum. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Southampton.
RATCLIFFE, M. (1997) Student decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19 (2) 167-182.
RATCLIFFE, M. (1999) Exploring aspects of scientific literacy in the classroom – evidence based decision-making. (pp 51-67) In: de Jong, O., Kortland, J., Waarlo, A. J. and Buddingh’, J. (1999) Bridging the gap between theory and practice: What research says to the science teacher. International Council for Associations for Science Education, Hatfiled, UK
RATCLIFFE, M. (2001) Science, Technology and Society in school science education. School Science Review. 82 (300), 83-92
RATCLIFFE, M., and GRACE, M (2003). Science Education for Citizenship, Maidenhead, Open University Press
ROSS, J.A. (1981) Improving adolescent decision-making skills. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(3), 279-295
SCOTT, P. and AMETLLER, J. (2007) Teaching science in a meaningful way: striking a balance between ‘opening up’ and closing down’ classroom talk. School Science Review. 88(324), 77-83
SIMON, S. and MALONEY, J. (2007) Activities for promoting small-group discussion and argumentation. School Science Review, 88(324), 49-57
SLATER, F. (1982) Interpreting and analysing attitudes and values. In Slater, F. Learning Through Geography. London: Heinemann, 81-105
SLATER, F. (1996) Values: towards mapping their locations in geography. In Kent, A., Lambert, D., Naish, M. and Slater, F. Viewpoints on Teaching and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
SOLOMON, J. (1992) The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: knowledge, attitudes and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 431-444
SOLOMON, J. (1993) Teaching Science, Technology and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press
STANISSTREET, M., SPOFFORTH, N. and WILLIAMS, T.R. (1993) Attitudes of children to the uses of animals. International Journal of Science Education. 15, 411-425
SWANN, J. (1992) Girls, boys and language. London: Blackwell.
TOULMIN, S. (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ZOLLER, U., EBENEZER, J., MORLEY, K., PARAS, S., SANDBERG, V., WEST, C., WALTHERS, T. and TAN, S.H. (1990) Goals attainment in Science-Technology-Society (S/T/S) education: expectations and reality. A probe into the case of British Columbia. Science Education 74, 1, 19-36