The impact of European Union law on English healthcare law
The impact of European Union law on English healthcare law
This paper suggests that the outcome of the ECJ reference in Watts is crucially important for the shape of English health care law and the maintenance of the fundamental principle expressed in Peerbooms that member states should not be forced to extend the scope of their social security systems. It shows that a move towards enforceable rights to funding for specific care in a foreign place of the patient’s choosing would introduce fundamental changes into English health care law. This would imply that the change should be strongly resisted by the UK government, as it was in the Müller-Fauré case. On the other hand, attention has also been drawn to developments in Government policy for the NHS that make the arguments used to resist the impact of European Union law look increasingly vulnerable. It remains to be seen whether Munby J’s approach in Watts will turn out to constitute a new dawn for NHS law or a wrecking attack on its fundamental principles.
medical law, health care law, european law
1841134902
145-156
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
2005
Montgomery, Jonathan
c4189a2c-86b8-466a-a7c8-985757206c04
Montgomery, Jonathan
(2005)
The impact of European Union law on English healthcare law.
In,
Dougan, Michael and Spaventa, Eleanor
(eds.)
Social Welfare and EU Law.
(Essays in European Law)
Oxford, UK.
Hart, .
Record type:
Book Section
Abstract
This paper suggests that the outcome of the ECJ reference in Watts is crucially important for the shape of English health care law and the maintenance of the fundamental principle expressed in Peerbooms that member states should not be forced to extend the scope of their social security systems. It shows that a move towards enforceable rights to funding for specific care in a foreign place of the patient’s choosing would introduce fundamental changes into English health care law. This would imply that the change should be strongly resisted by the UK government, as it was in the Müller-Fauré case. On the other hand, attention has also been drawn to developments in Government policy for the NHS that make the arguments used to resist the impact of European Union law look increasingly vulnerable. It remains to be seen whether Munby J’s approach in Watts will turn out to constitute a new dawn for NHS law or a wrecking attack on its fundamental principles.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2005
Additional Information:
Article on case law subsequently considered in European Court of Justice
Keywords:
medical law, health care law, european law
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 73159
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73159
ISBN: 1841134902
ISSN: 0261-3875
PURE UUID: 63c68995-4d3c-446e-bbd8-bf921d67ae09
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 03 Mar 2010
Last modified: 29 Feb 2024 17:52
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Jonathan Montgomery
Editor:
Michael Dougan
Editor:
Eleanor Spaventa
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics