Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates
Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates
This is an evaluation of estimates of the costs of adaptation made by the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 2007 and by some preceding studies
(UNFCCC, 2007; Stern, 2006; World Bank, 2006; Oxfam, 2007; UNDP, 2007). The costs have
been used as the basis for discussion regarding the levels of investment needed for adaptation to
climate change. They have been influential in the debate concerning funding for climate change
and it is important, therefore, that such estimates of cost are as robust as possible. The purpose of
this report is to assess these estimates and consider ways to improve them in the future.
The UNFCCC report was based on a set of commissioned studies (UNFCCC background
papers, 2007). These took place over a short period dictated by the timescale of the UNFCCC
process and the need to report the results to the next Conference of the Parties, so there was no
time for independent review of a draft of the report.
It is important, therefore, to recall the objectives of the UNFCCC report and the caveats that the
authors ascribed to its conclusions. The study was a preliminary one of the funding, especially the
public funding, estimated to be needed in the year 2030 to meet the challenge of climate change.
It is not a study of the full cost of avoiding all damage. It does not cover some important activities,
and other activities are only partially covered. The authors suggest that their estimates are
probably under-estimates and that much more study is needed.
The purpose of this evaluation is to consider the relative strengths and weaknesses of the
UNFCCC study, so that we can determine what next steps can be taken to improve our
understanding of the issue. It is not our purpose here to develop a revised set of numbers for
the funding of adaptation to climate change, because we believe this requires detailed study
International Institute for Environment and Development
Parry, Martin
64e98f10-a315-4e4a-9859-51a8044da4ff
Arnell, Nigel
b3aeba9d-59fe-4608-aa60-4eae969212e2
Berry, Pam
758a11f8-0047-4bfa-9742-37759a3bad7a
Dodman, David
e428d917-125f-453e-9e03-1290d5807c81
Fankhauser, Samuel
ca87f762-3307-40fc-ac22-5756ae9efa56
Hope, Chris
2187d34c-9662-4828-8337-a665c1feffad
Kovats, Sari
2dc64555-42cb-403d-8dbb-76e50281ba1d
Nicholls, Robert
4ce1e355-cc5d-4702-8124-820932c57076
Satterthwaite, David
5364d844-29b9-4e78-9a5a-ae7fafb580d4
Tiffin, Richard
fb374c90-ee1e-44c2-89a8-05069da4b0c6
Wheeler, Tim
d5f63966-8f3b-4e4c-a2f8-95d4bb0bac66
2009
Parry, Martin
64e98f10-a315-4e4a-9859-51a8044da4ff
Arnell, Nigel
b3aeba9d-59fe-4608-aa60-4eae969212e2
Berry, Pam
758a11f8-0047-4bfa-9742-37759a3bad7a
Dodman, David
e428d917-125f-453e-9e03-1290d5807c81
Fankhauser, Samuel
ca87f762-3307-40fc-ac22-5756ae9efa56
Hope, Chris
2187d34c-9662-4828-8337-a665c1feffad
Kovats, Sari
2dc64555-42cb-403d-8dbb-76e50281ba1d
Nicholls, Robert
4ce1e355-cc5d-4702-8124-820932c57076
Satterthwaite, David
5364d844-29b9-4e78-9a5a-ae7fafb580d4
Tiffin, Richard
fb374c90-ee1e-44c2-89a8-05069da4b0c6
Wheeler, Tim
d5f63966-8f3b-4e4c-a2f8-95d4bb0bac66
Parry, Martin, Arnell, Nigel, Berry, Pam, Dodman, David, Fankhauser, Samuel, Hope, Chris, Kovats, Sari, Nicholls, Robert, Satterthwaite, David, Tiffin, Richard and Wheeler, Tim
(2009)
Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates
London, UK.
International Institute for Environment and Development
116pp.
Record type:
Monograph
(Project Report)
Abstract
This is an evaluation of estimates of the costs of adaptation made by the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 2007 and by some preceding studies
(UNFCCC, 2007; Stern, 2006; World Bank, 2006; Oxfam, 2007; UNDP, 2007). The costs have
been used as the basis for discussion regarding the levels of investment needed for adaptation to
climate change. They have been influential in the debate concerning funding for climate change
and it is important, therefore, that such estimates of cost are as robust as possible. The purpose of
this report is to assess these estimates and consider ways to improve them in the future.
The UNFCCC report was based on a set of commissioned studies (UNFCCC background
papers, 2007). These took place over a short period dictated by the timescale of the UNFCCC
process and the need to report the results to the next Conference of the Parties, so there was no
time for independent review of a draft of the report.
It is important, therefore, to recall the objectives of the UNFCCC report and the caveats that the
authors ascribed to its conclusions. The study was a preliminary one of the funding, especially the
public funding, estimated to be needed in the year 2030 to meet the challenge of climate change.
It is not a study of the full cost of avoiding all damage. It does not cover some important activities,
and other activities are only partially covered. The authors suggest that their estimates are
probably under-estimates and that much more study is needed.
The purpose of this evaluation is to consider the relative strengths and weaknesses of the
UNFCCC study, so that we can determine what next steps can be taken to improve our
understanding of the issue. It is not our purpose here to develop a revised set of numbers for
the funding of adaptation to climate change, because we believe this requires detailed study
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2009
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 73760
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/73760
PURE UUID: 9a60fdd1-8c78-4f8e-9bd3-586589608691
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 12 Mar 2010
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:52
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Martin Parry
Author:
Nigel Arnell
Author:
Pam Berry
Author:
David Dodman
Author:
Samuel Fankhauser
Author:
Chris Hope
Author:
Sari Kovats
Author:
David Satterthwaite
Author:
Richard Tiffin
Author:
Tim Wheeler
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics