Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates
Parry, Martin, Arnell, Nigel, Berry, Pam, Dodman, David, Fankhauser, Samuel, Hope, Chris, Kovats, Sari, Nicholls, Robert, Satterthwaite, David, Tiffin, Richard and Wheeler, Tim (2009) Assessing the costs of adaptation to climate change: a review of the UNFCCC and other recent estimates. London, UK, International Institute for Environment and Development, 116pp.
Full text not available from this repository.
This is an evaluation of estimates of the costs of adaptation made by the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 2007 and by some preceding studies
(UNFCCC, 2007; Stern, 2006; World Bank, 2006; Oxfam, 2007; UNDP, 2007). The costs have
been used as the basis for discussion regarding the levels of investment needed for adaptation to
climate change. They have been influential in the debate concerning funding for climate change
and it is important, therefore, that such estimates of cost are as robust as possible. The purpose of
this report is to assess these estimates and consider ways to improve them in the future.
The UNFCCC report was based on a set of commissioned studies (UNFCCC background
papers, 2007). These took place over a short period dictated by the timescale of the UNFCCC
process and the need to report the results to the next Conference of the Parties, so there was no
time for independent review of a draft of the report.
It is important, therefore, to recall the objectives of the UNFCCC report and the caveats that the
authors ascribed to its conclusions. The study was a preliminary one of the funding, especially the
public funding, estimated to be needed in the year 2030 to meet the challenge of climate change.
It is not a study of the full cost of avoiding all damage. It does not cover some important activities,
and other activities are only partially covered. The authors suggest that their estimates are
probably under-estimates and that much more study is needed.
The purpose of this evaluation is to consider the relative strengths and weaknesses of the
UNFCCC study, so that we can determine what next steps can be taken to improve our
understanding of the issue. It is not our purpose here to develop a revised set of numbers for
the funding of adaptation to climate change, because we believe this requires detailed study
|Item Type:||Monograph (Other)|
|Subjects:||G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
|Divisions:||University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Civil Engineering and the Environment
|Date Deposited:||12 Mar 2010|
|Last Modified:||02 Mar 2012 13:57|
|Contributors:||Parry, Martin (Author)
Arnell, Nigel (Author)
Berry, Pam (Author)
Dodman, David (Author)
Fankhauser, Samuel (Author)
Hope, Chris (Author)
Kovats, Sari (Author)
Nicholls, Robert (Author)
Satterthwaite, David (Author)
Tiffin, Richard (Author)
Wheeler, Tim (Author)
|Publisher:||International Institute for Environment and Development|
|RDF:||RDF+N-Triples, RDF+N3, RDF+XML, Browse.|
Actions (login required)