The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Legibility and readability of light reflecting matrix variable message road signs

Legibility and readability of light reflecting matrix variable message road signs
Legibility and readability of light reflecting matrix variable message road signs
Driving is a dynamic task. Hence, for a given message, readability depends on legibility distance and reading time. In laboratory simulation and outdoor tests, the variables of pixel shape, letter width/height ratio, font and letter separation were studied. Nearly 100 subjects took part in the laboratory simulation using monochrome slides. Half the subjects assessed legibility distance while the remainder determined reading time. The method of limits was used to determine the thresholds for legibility distance and reading time for nearly 50 different formats of matrix sign. For legibility distance, the thresholds found in the laboratory were validated using real signs in an outdoor situation. However, it was not possible to validate reading times in a similar manner due to lack of availability of sufficiently large full scale signs. Variations in format had a marked effect on legibility distance, but a lesser impact on reading time. In general, letters with any regular shaped pixel, a width/height ratio approaching 1.0, an upper case font and a letter separation of two pixels were found to be most effective.

1477-1535
143-148
Collins, J.J.
49f88056-745c-4c56-8516-2e2baa5c271b
Hall, R.D.
b3b7ddd4-09bb-4150-8bc2-f68d92bdfad4
Collins, J.J.
49f88056-745c-4c56-8516-2e2baa5c271b
Hall, R.D.
b3b7ddd4-09bb-4150-8bc2-f68d92bdfad4

Collins, J.J. and Hall, R.D. (1994) Legibility and readability of light reflecting matrix variable message road signs. Lighting Research and Technology, 24 (3), 143-148. (doi:10.1177/096032719202400304).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Driving is a dynamic task. Hence, for a given message, readability depends on legibility distance and reading time. In laboratory simulation and outdoor tests, the variables of pixel shape, letter width/height ratio, font and letter separation were studied. Nearly 100 subjects took part in the laboratory simulation using monochrome slides. Half the subjects assessed legibility distance while the remainder determined reading time. The method of limits was used to determine the thresholds for legibility distance and reading time for nearly 50 different formats of matrix sign. For legibility distance, the thresholds found in the laboratory were validated using real signs in an outdoor situation. However, it was not possible to validate reading times in a similar manner due to lack of availability of sufficiently large full scale signs. Variations in format had a marked effect on legibility distance, but a lesser impact on reading time. In general, letters with any regular shaped pixel, a width/height ratio approaching 1.0, an upper case font and a letter separation of two pixels were found to be most effective.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 1994

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 75622
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/75622
ISSN: 1477-1535
PURE UUID: 33f4ab36-c2b2-4049-9a9c-f06d6b9839f9

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 11 Mar 2010
Last modified: 13 Mar 2024 23:00

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J.J. Collins
Author: R.D. Hall

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×