An English jurisdiction clause does battle with Canadian legislation similar to the Hamburg Rules
An English jurisdiction clause does battle with Canadian legislation similar to the Hamburg Rules
Analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in OT Africa Line Ltd v Magic Sportswear Corp on whether an English exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading took priority to the Canadian Marine Liability Act 2001 s.46. Reviews the European Court of Justice ruling in Owusu v Jackson (t/a Villa Holidays Bal Inn Villas) (C-281/02) on jurisdiction under Council Regulation 44/2001 Art.23 where a party was domiciled in a Member State.
143-154
Baatz, Yvonne
31b18d44-bd29-4014-ad3b-551b50f9bbd6
May 2006
Baatz, Yvonne
31b18d44-bd29-4014-ad3b-551b50f9bbd6
Baatz, Yvonne
(2006)
An English jurisdiction clause does battle with Canadian legislation similar to the Hamburg Rules.
Lloyd's Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly, (2), .
Abstract
Analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in OT Africa Line Ltd v Magic Sportswear Corp on whether an English exclusive jurisdiction clause in a bill of lading took priority to the Canadian Marine Liability Act 2001 s.46. Reviews the European Court of Justice ruling in Owusu v Jackson (t/a Villa Holidays Bal Inn Villas) (C-281/02) on jurisdiction under Council Regulation 44/2001 Art.23 where a party was domiciled in a Member State.
Text
Baatz_Y_LMCLQ_2006_Issue_2.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: May 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 79637
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/79637
ISSN: 0306-2945
PURE UUID: 85d7db21-bb13-4be4-a757-bf3ed720e133
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Mar 2010
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 00:32
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Yvonne Baatz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics