English jurisdiction clauses - a matter of choice in Europe?
English jurisdiction clauses - a matter of choice in Europe?
Examines the effectiveness of English jurisdiction clauses in circumstances where related actions are brought in the courts of England and another Member State and the English court is not the court first seised. Comments on the High Court decision in JP Morgan Europe Ltd v Primacom AG on whether, despite the action in the first seised court appearing to have been brought in breach of a clear jurisdiction clause and as a delaying tactic, the English court as the court second seised was obliged by Council Regulation 44/2001 Arts.27 and 28 to stay proceedings
8-11
Baatz, Yvonne
31b18d44-bd29-4014-ad3b-551b50f9bbd6
2006
Baatz, Yvonne
31b18d44-bd29-4014-ad3b-551b50f9bbd6
Baatz, Yvonne
(2006)
English jurisdiction clauses - a matter of choice in Europe?
Shipping and Transport International, 6 (1), .
Abstract
Examines the effectiveness of English jurisdiction clauses in circumstances where related actions are brought in the courts of England and another Member State and the English court is not the court first seised. Comments on the High Court decision in JP Morgan Europe Ltd v Primacom AG on whether, despite the action in the first seised court appearing to have been brought in breach of a clear jurisdiction clause and as a delaying tactic, the English court as the court second seised was obliged by Council Regulation 44/2001 Arts.27 and 28 to stay proceedings
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 79638
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/79638
ISSN: 1752-9896
PURE UUID: ac2b1e67-3cf3-48e8-b73e-531f0e99bbaa
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 17 Mar 2010
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 17:34
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Yvonne Baatz
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics