Kierkegaard contra Hegel on the 'Absolute Paradox'

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia (2009) Kierkegaard contra Hegel on the 'Absolute Paradox'. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain, (59/60), 54-66.


[img] Microsoft Word - Accepted Manuscript
Download (83Kb)
[img] Plain Text - Other
Restricted to System admin

Download (2870b) | Request a copy


In the Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion Hegel propounds three inter-related theses:

(1) The radical continuity of religion and philosophy.
(2) The view that philosophy renders in conceptual form the essence of what Christianity consists in and thus transcends the merely subjective vantage-point of faith.
(3) Philosophy alone shows Christianity to be rational and necessary.

Kierkegaard’s pseudonym, Johannes Climacus, attacks all three of these theses in Conculding Unscientific Postscript, and he introduces the category of the ‘absolute paradox’ (the Christian Incarnation) in order to do so. It is consequently a mistake to think, as Jon Stewart (2003) does, that Climacus has no quarrel with Hegel himself, but only with the Danish neo-Hegelians such as Heiberg and Martensen. For as the present paper will show, Climacus and Hegel in fact have diametrically opposed conceptions of Christianity and so could not fail to be at loggerheads with each other.

Item Type: Article
ISSNs: 0263-5232 (print)
Related URLs:
Keywords: hegel, kierkegaard, absolute paradox, mediation, christianity, speculative philosophy, religion
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BD Speculative Philosophy
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion
Divisions : University Structure - Pre August 2011 > School of Humanities > Philosophy
ePrint ID: 80103
Accepted Date and Publication Date:
December 2009Published
Date Deposited: 24 Mar 2010
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2016 10:38

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics