The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evaluation of OCMIP-2 ocean models' deep circulation with mantle helium-3

Evaluation of OCMIP-2 ocean models' deep circulation with mantle helium-3
Evaluation of OCMIP-2 ocean models' deep circulation with mantle helium-3
We compare simulations of the injection of mantle helium-3 into the deep ocean from six global coarse resolution models which participated in the Ocean Carbon Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP). We also discuss the results of a study carried out with one of the models, which examines the effect of the subgrid-scale mixing parameterization. These sensitivity tests provide useful information to interpret the differences among the OCMIP models and between model simulations and the data.
We find that the OCMIP models, which parameterize subgrid-scale mixing using an eddy-induced velocity, tend to underestimate the ventilation of the deep ocean, based on diagnostics with 3He. In these models, this parameterization is implemented with a constant thickness diffusivity coefficient. In future simulations, we recommend using such a parameterization with spatially and temporally varying coefficients in order to moderate its effect on stratification.
The performance of the models with regard to the formation of AABW confirms the conclusion from a previous evaluation with CFC-11. Models coupled with a sea-ice model produce a substantial bottom water formation in the Southern Ocean that tends to overestimate AABW ventilation, while models that are not coupled with a sea-ice model systematically underestimate the formation of AABW.
We also analyze specific features of the deep 3He distribution (3He plumes) that are particularly well depicted in the data and which put severe constraints on the deep circulation. We show that all the models fail to reproduce a correct propagation of these plumes in the deep ocean. The resolution of the models may be too coarse to reproduce the strong and narrow currents in the deep ocean, and the models do not incorporate the geothermal heating that may also contribute to the generation of these currents. We also use the context of OCMIP-2 to explore the potential of mantle helium-3 as a tool to compare and evaluate modeled deep-ocean circulations. Although the source function of mantle helium is known with a rather large uncertainty, we find that the parameterization used for the injection of mantle helium-3 is sufficient to generate realistic results, even in the Atlantic Ocean where a previous pioneering study [J. Geophys. Res. 100 (1995) 3829] claimed this parameterization generates inadequate results. These results are supported by a multi-tracer evaluation performed by considering the simulated distributions of both helium-3 and natural 14C, and comparing the simulated tracer fields with available data.
OCMIP-2, Helium-3, Parameterization
0924-7963
15-36
Dutay, J-C.
7ec4a48e-4f4f-4ae7-b957-eeca8f130eee
Jean-Baptiste, P.
c386ba5d-4ce1-448c-868f-d59002035eee
Campin, J-M.
edef92ac-5775-4f4a-8da1-74a9b1cfb765
Ishida, A.
10936baa-36ac-4df7-b009-77dfa069d80b
Maier-Reimer, E.
6e989e27-8061-42d1-ae64-b0672b7f1882
Matear, R.J.
22d47009-8b64-4a5d-a173-8edab042105c
Mouchet, A.
ba5a0969-7038-4dc6-8950-847b6c2303e6
Totterdell, I.J.
aa4619a0-1b39-4b1b-8633-f416c6063817
Yamanaka, Y.
dcb711e3-ddcb-4ee8-b0a1-6d9031b846ce
Rogers, K.
67fd7192-bdf3-44fe-9d8b-238ecba16a60
Madec, G.
7e2ec04b-896a-4861-b2d0-b74f39d748c2
Orr, J.C.
59198c8e-f89d-40ec-90b5-1d94de00ac5a
Dutay, J-C.
7ec4a48e-4f4f-4ae7-b957-eeca8f130eee
Jean-Baptiste, P.
c386ba5d-4ce1-448c-868f-d59002035eee
Campin, J-M.
edef92ac-5775-4f4a-8da1-74a9b1cfb765
Ishida, A.
10936baa-36ac-4df7-b009-77dfa069d80b
Maier-Reimer, E.
6e989e27-8061-42d1-ae64-b0672b7f1882
Matear, R.J.
22d47009-8b64-4a5d-a173-8edab042105c
Mouchet, A.
ba5a0969-7038-4dc6-8950-847b6c2303e6
Totterdell, I.J.
aa4619a0-1b39-4b1b-8633-f416c6063817
Yamanaka, Y.
dcb711e3-ddcb-4ee8-b0a1-6d9031b846ce
Rogers, K.
67fd7192-bdf3-44fe-9d8b-238ecba16a60
Madec, G.
7e2ec04b-896a-4861-b2d0-b74f39d748c2
Orr, J.C.
59198c8e-f89d-40ec-90b5-1d94de00ac5a

Dutay, J-C., Jean-Baptiste, P., Campin, J-M., Ishida, A., Maier-Reimer, E., Matear, R.J., Mouchet, A., Totterdell, I.J., Yamanaka, Y., Rogers, K., Madec, G. and Orr, J.C. (2004) Evaluation of OCMIP-2 ocean models' deep circulation with mantle helium-3. Journal of Marine Systems, 48 (1-4), 15-36. (doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.05.010).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We compare simulations of the injection of mantle helium-3 into the deep ocean from six global coarse resolution models which participated in the Ocean Carbon Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP). We also discuss the results of a study carried out with one of the models, which examines the effect of the subgrid-scale mixing parameterization. These sensitivity tests provide useful information to interpret the differences among the OCMIP models and between model simulations and the data.
We find that the OCMIP models, which parameterize subgrid-scale mixing using an eddy-induced velocity, tend to underestimate the ventilation of the deep ocean, based on diagnostics with 3He. In these models, this parameterization is implemented with a constant thickness diffusivity coefficient. In future simulations, we recommend using such a parameterization with spatially and temporally varying coefficients in order to moderate its effect on stratification.
The performance of the models with regard to the formation of AABW confirms the conclusion from a previous evaluation with CFC-11. Models coupled with a sea-ice model produce a substantial bottom water formation in the Southern Ocean that tends to overestimate AABW ventilation, while models that are not coupled with a sea-ice model systematically underestimate the formation of AABW.
We also analyze specific features of the deep 3He distribution (3He plumes) that are particularly well depicted in the data and which put severe constraints on the deep circulation. We show that all the models fail to reproduce a correct propagation of these plumes in the deep ocean. The resolution of the models may be too coarse to reproduce the strong and narrow currents in the deep ocean, and the models do not incorporate the geothermal heating that may also contribute to the generation of these currents. We also use the context of OCMIP-2 to explore the potential of mantle helium-3 as a tool to compare and evaluate modeled deep-ocean circulations. Although the source function of mantle helium is known with a rather large uncertainty, we find that the parameterization used for the injection of mantle helium-3 is sufficient to generate realistic results, even in the Atlantic Ocean where a previous pioneering study [J. Geophys. Res. 100 (1995) 3829] claimed this parameterization generates inadequate results. These results are supported by a multi-tracer evaluation performed by considering the simulated distributions of both helium-3 and natural 14C, and comparing the simulated tracer fields with available data.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: OCMIP-2, Helium-3, Parameterization

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 9702
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/9702
ISSN: 0924-7963
PURE UUID: 5044729d-c115-4b50-9bb4-4997f3035449

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Oct 2004
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 04:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J-C. Dutay
Author: P. Jean-Baptiste
Author: J-M. Campin
Author: A. Ishida
Author: E. Maier-Reimer
Author: R.J. Matear
Author: A. Mouchet
Author: I.J. Totterdell
Author: Y. Yamanaka
Author: K. Rogers
Author: G. Madec
Author: J.C. Orr

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×